Re: [bmwg] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 09 June 2017 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE99129483 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kEOylSOHujhC for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x236.google.com (mail-ua0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64D9129432 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 68so16265237uas.0 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 07:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wA7cegSh3QWmIjAgSmbUirw9WsSTh+ABqrwLMx3i2nU=; b=Pyt8CPX1ylt/Sd8cUhkDIJCph+0ZuovNWM0/xoYrGruP+SSoPMnqk0eOKTTLSP7JCJ cxmgAYBtz4T4kkA/mZXniWEDFbZ+onl/tBrk1eKPBuMooV2FuL3Es70LLJau7TSP7cQA lMvPdQpY4UxZRPcaWdfElgHrnPuR+WmvVM2dALBNgYH7VAvXA0Ax8s5jQdf8keeRB6ai J6ffmLHXxvq2r11gutxscm4olf26QXZ7nHywvFSDHFyjNsFLtS5p0RxOlbCJl/OXUC+X BQjQkENUMAotzvV/cBhfPc2rcWlYVVMCLlHSPpJ92bIbaZwgQa7RI9yrY9LemKX/5NZY upJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wA7cegSh3QWmIjAgSmbUirw9WsSTh+ABqrwLMx3i2nU=; b=IkdUPmQ30caL+vKOrd4BFqDuEUJ6kcDzoa4LQ7K2lnAyJVuODW6FAAYxmjnjxNaU/t OEj9uBtmvWdnYEdU03VCBneJ3r2g4LuWcYQARwJI45wCHQ/5Cfqwsye4u3/GnsMVnK5g 4MbVKMZxtcDM/s5FxAJe7fsszqfTzMsGqGtnf/Zum0FqiSUUW+vzM3AFS6WqNN4DY0c4 MNBt1kUGf9/K/PzcS96ziDNNmC2vVXxrZSojd7ENrn+nOONcQyvxLufhLQ5B5Kba2dxr QjAuRFkoqIoVvAKIvK/tfKT3IOia7Ho5PGytjWjRF7ag9auCil8ExOoLrbZ7cRno6gYQ VK8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAniD62lBAnLV2zanN5flfiodikWyM2NsL6XQtgdlbndEA6M22q Ymb4dKrrly9eD1FJrWmfaNOKWFiBQ732
X-Received: by 10.176.77.230 with SMTP id b38mr25356301uah.76.1497017119621; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 07:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.82.198 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149701213054.30067.9344581960553002293.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149701213054.30067.9344581960553002293.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:04:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLOHfNwwcC2ET27vxJTqrz8XCgTheLRKr7N5kjf6z1n3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sbanks@encrypted.net, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/vdRq--5VBZS-8yp04sIQvMCsujA>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 14:05:23 -0000

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and comments. One nit:
>
> s/for a future draft/for a future document/
>

Good catch! Thank you for helping improve the document - I think that
the changes make it much better.

Dear authors, please note this to flag for the RFC Editor ( will as
well, but just in case).

W
-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf