IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lucien <lucien.avramov@gmail.com> Thu, 22 June 2017 06:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lucien.avramov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EC5128D16; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XbJbyzx2KIIW; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x231.google.com (mail-yb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E4712946B; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 84so2006853ybe.0; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FDMUt2dx0YYQGUbCiet5beJUp9Z8Za3Fi5Im7y+YSyI=; b=mq0evb1JIAeKInbP6pvSM2zgTtwgKkRE4ldTsnKxMPraTIkjFvQROxTXPIbRBQMfOA sP3x6SCDBye79rVxl9Ox3KP6UiQNeX6UVtb/e4+kBM85ZQBv8ES2LGBtSCUWC/F4DG0H XD413oK0khrerAAflwiii1p4kRsVAfjUK7Tt8MLn/5rHfv6iEf89D7qC4xZriLMlLg+n dz9GId2TDH/zKF8nv/0JGNCKQW535P7UGSHu2CBbvHBGEsiKm7Ps54NwnvYFWSh8+316 wC+YXILI4nk/E+ZO5hiA03WPO/FydHspNZlmMAxK34XRYR0qayJSFsto3AO8yQPn5GGd qOLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FDMUt2dx0YYQGUbCiet5beJUp9Z8Za3Fi5Im7y+YSyI=; b=PdYmWcNR8Yn4doeBihVXtY88KWesBqZESyIjGfx6YAyD+rtsKI8QJtPXRJ9d62wGHZ J2JTP2NaH5tGzXopARkU5OQgVM+mrlcY7Tg1Kat6TC2dyKhyH7MZfr/LX1OqwAX4yw8h ugqZy/QjFYbyx+Z96nSAlNVg1C0YVtqH61F8cBBfN7FItD2dgfpZ95xqlNFsPi4rYvo8 sXyN/GZxVUMllAm2js/4I5ZVYBze3z/r6I/BjhiHGY+S1yIbqEZRCBdOpvGV6F9sYdzp NOwl1Ox35GOAPIGpDGmn5PfMv2mRtpZ/xcBHfhCAa/curGjgDJz+f+7nmMqkiG6XOuwp G/tQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOy2r5MyID4vI5DR1nqapQzx0D5/TnKBVKghufvBwTT4K3Bsyono 6ON5VU2WffJqIGpaoqT8SZwOQ4vzZw==
X-Received: by 10.37.180.18 with SMTP id n18mr605104ybj.258.1498114563680; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.145.2 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D20E70F6-3E3C-4929-B7DB-CA718BF376A2@cisco.com>
References: <149790794238.10693.2532866777748124406.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALTEt=C9pzd4w9HjstXjzbj6awbdhTR66CF=H75O_39q0NK_iA@mail.gmail.com> <D78D2206-5A27-40E3-9E29-8C4A8D1ABD01@cisco.com> <CAArZqeWN2suTLp5DUNsqEK5uCP7pa7-rtu7510c508jQMwYTeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAArZqeXLEnN0XQBvC2L5WrLx33NLg2nH9Jqs6PbPcycb9yRqhQ@mail.gmail.com> <D20E70F6-3E3C-4929-B7DB-CA718BF376A2@cisco.com>
From: Lucien <lucien.avramov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:56:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAArZqeVbBUjOBf1BUV+y9DXa1kM9RKuNW6_DE3=VjMDN7AvkOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Cc: "bmwg-chairs@ietf.org" <bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>, Lucien Avramov <lucienav@google.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology@ietf.org>, Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e6aa266b3ee055286fa04"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/zbrTzVLy8QsqCmkWjt2dpicdAFE>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:56:12 -0000

Thanks Alvaro! Fixed the Nit also now...


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com
> wrote:

> On 6/22/17, 6:58 AM, "iesg on behalf of Lucien" <iesg-bounces@ietf.org on
> behalf of lucien.avramov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Lucien:
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> > I removed 1.2 per your suggestion. It's now all consistent.
>
> >
>
> > Please confirm it's good for you?
>
>
> Yes, the change is fine with me.  I’ll clear the DISCUSS.
>
>
>
> Just one nit:  The phrase “Additional interpretation of RFC2119 terms:”
> seems out of place because there is no additional clarification about the
> keywords in the paragraph after it.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Alvaro.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email