Re: [Bnbsg] BnB IoT Messaging

Drew Dvorshak <dvorshak@isoc.org> Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dvorshak@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: bnbsg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bnbsg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430011A0087 for <bnbsg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4JX6e1naZKG for <bnbsg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0240.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513C71A0124 for <bnbsg@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO2PR06MB682.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.226.144) by CO2PR06MB683.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.226.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.934.12; Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:43 +0000
Received: from CO2PR06MB682.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.226.144]) by CO2PR06MB682.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.226.144]) with mapi id 15.00.0934.000; Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:43 +0000
From: Drew Dvorshak <dvorshak@isoc.org>
To: Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com>, "bnbsg@ietf.org" <bnbsg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bnbsg] BnB IoT Messaging
Thread-Index: AQHPbshHfpwcECwsXU6/PMECXJ4YdZs+dlGA
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CF97C309.17156%dvorshak@isoc.org>
References: <A2419C90-B7AD-41D5-9B82-8132E9860AA2@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <A2419C90-B7AD-41D5-9B82-8132E9860AA2@amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.226.66.170]
x-forefront-prvs: 0210479ED8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019001)(6009001)(428001)(199002)(164054003)(377454003)(189002)(479174003)(53754006)(51704005)(24454002)(83322001)(2656002)(21056001)(36756003)(66066001)(76482001)(20776003)(101416001)(86362001)(4396001)(92726001)(79102001)(77982001)(81542001)(74502001)(74662001)(76176999)(99286001)(46102001)(80022001)(87936001)(85852003)(50986999)(81342001)(19580395003)(77096999)(19580405001)(54356999)(99396002)(83072002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR06MB683; H:CO2PR06MB682.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dvorshak@isoc.org;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <E1D5AB1F41471849BB59F893FE28D93A@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bnbsg/763Mziy0aYGugenOzwSxraxZO2M
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: [Bnbsg] BnB IoT Messaging
X-BeenThere: bnbsg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bnbsg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bnbsg>, <mailto:bnbsg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bnbsg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bnbsg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bnbsg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bnbsg>, <mailto:bnbsg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:54 -0000

Hi all,
Are we sure we want to send this out now instead in prep. For Hawaii?  I
say this because we already have multiple commitments signed that may or
may not follow the IoT theme.  We could not wait until we had that fleshed
out to begin filling tables.

On 5/13/14, 12:27 PM, "Alexa Morris" <amorris@amsl.com>; wrote:

>Hi Everyone,
>
>Alex and Pascal generously responded to my request for a ³call for demos²
>writeup for the upcoming IoT-themed BnB event in Toronto. Their draft is
>attached and embedded below, please review and comment.
>
>After any tweaking, I think that we should send this information out to
>the appropriate WG mailing lists and to the mail IETF list as well.
>Potential participants will be asked to send their questions about
>participating to  bnbsg@ietf.org.  The info will also go on the website
>(as News and under IETF 90 area) and hopefully it will assist Drew in his
>participant recruitment efforts.
>
>We are under a tight timeframe, so I¹d like to send out the call for
>participants before the end of the week (ideally Thursday).
>
>Thanks,
>Alexa
>
>
>‹‹
>
>		  Bits-N-Bites - Internet of Things
>		  ---------------------------------
>
>			    Call for Demos
>
>The arrival of Things connected to the Internet in the recent years
>brought to life new applications.  In the consumer segment, numerous
>small and smart devices add new dimensions to existing domains such
>automatic home management, in-vehicle entertainment, eHealth, fitness
>and more.  A growing enthusiasm in novel market suggests
>imminent and impressive deployments: billions new connected devices
>expected by year 2020.
>
>In professional segments, examples abound of the use of connected Things
>for 
>future manufacturing and Machine-to-Machine communications. As of today,
>factory networks primarily rely on wired communication networks to
>support 
>Industrial Automation and Control Systems.  On the other hand, Wireless
>Sensor Networks have the power to extend the reach of Monitoring and
>Control 
>to gather unused measurements beyond what is physically and economically
>possible with wires; the collection of these measurements by widely
>distributed 
>sensing devices and their processing by Big Data analytics yield the next
>degree of process optimization, a vision known as the Industrial
>Internet. This   
>will require the combination of the best of IT and OT technologies
>together, 
>forming the IT/OT convergence.
>
>Despite the word 'connected' being commonly employed in this context,
>the current Thing topologies do not use IP as known in the non-Things
>world.  Instead, intermediary albeit small Boxes translating between
>IP and Thing-specific protocols are in common use (for
>e.g. application-layer conversions, IP to non-IP address translation,
>IP header compression, 'mesh-under' non-IP routing and more).  This
>leads to typical 'multi-stage' topology such as: a temperature sensor
>connected to a smartwatch using a hardware communication protocol,
>further connected to a smartphone using a short-range non-IP protocol
>and finally connected to a WiFi router using a full IP link.
>
>
>On another hand, past experience in the development of the Internet
>suggests that if intermediary Boxes are less present in the path -
>dumb networks (thus reducing the 'multi-stage' Thing topology to a
>minimum of 2 stages and down to 1, ideally), the full potential of
>end-to-end principles may be uncovered: each Thing may be directly
>queried, their number may grow in a more scalable way and richer
>applications may offer features beyond what's talked about these days.
>
>When deploying multi-stage Thing topologies, two trends compete: IP
>protocols are enhanced and transformed into less end-to-end protocols
>(address translation, header compression, 'mesh under' routing and
>more) and, alternatively, existing IP protocols are reduced to their
>bare minimum such as to fit in reduced Things (reduced CPU frequency
>and number of transistors, dimensions and energy consumption).
>
>Demonstrations of these IoT concepts are called for.  The
>demonstrations should exhibit recent developments of IP protocols for
>IoT networks (6lowpan adaptation layers, MANET and RPL routing
>protocols, 6tsch time-constrained communications, CoAP app-layer
>protocols) as well as demonstrations of the tendency of bringing the
>known IPv6 as close as possible to the Thing - minimum set of
>unmodified IPv6, Neighbor Discovery, DHCP, HTTP, IKEv2.
>
>Examples of demos include and are certainly not limited to:
>- home automation controller using SNMP for HVAC and ambient
>  temperature, electricity counter.
>- industrial-grade Wireless Sensor Network products
>- scalable wireless designs and existing deployments
>- IPv6 end-to-end and backbone interconnection
>- tablet summarizing status of widespread devices through
>  heterogeneous link connections.
>- smart belt collecting body information with low-energy communication
>  protocols.
>- vehicle interior connected designs, vehicle-to-road sensor-based
>  communications.
>- sensor-assisted autonomous mobile Things (mono-, bi-, quad- wheeled
>  or propelled devices).
>
>Demonstrations may be realized in different manners:
>- the Things deployed on a table, relying on local connections and
>  alternatively exhibiting remote access across the  Internet.
>- poster describing demo.
>- video sequence showing a lab demonstration.
>
>Each demonstration must position with respect to questions such as
>- use of IP protocols: IPv4 or IPv6?
>- intermediary Box or not?
>- on the market now, in the prototype stage, in an idea phase?
>- part of a collaborative project?  gov't-funded or private?
>
>
>
>
>
>