Re: [Bridge-mib] Doubt on 802.1w (max age)

dharam <dharam.jhatakia@gmail.com> Fri, 23 February 2007 17:53 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKebt-0006Qe-4Y; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:53:33 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKCe1-0006bm-Jb for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:01:53 -0500
Received: from www.nabble.com ([72.21.53.35] helo=talk.nabble.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKCe0-0000hl-AK for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:01:53 -0500
Received: from [72.21.53.38] (helo=jubjub.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HKCdz-0005Wi-Rn for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:01:51 -0800
Message-ID: <9098657.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:01:51 -0800
From: dharam <dharam.jhatakia@gmail.com>
To: bridge-mib@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge-mib] Doubt on 802.1w (max age)
In-Reply-To: <1251.192.168.14.204.1169197813.squirrel@192.168.14.204>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Nabble-From: dharam.jhatakia@gmail.com
References: <1251.192.168.14.204.1169197813.squirrel@192.168.14.204>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:53:31 -0500
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Bridge MIB <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org

Hi There,

Just wanted to check which RSTP code you are using. Is it the RSTP LIB on
source forge . Was your testing successful ? 

Did you have to do any modifications to RSTPLIB so that it actually sends
out BPDUs or it sends it out anyways. 

Please email your response to dharam.jhatakia@gmail.com

pjoseph wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Setup:
>      6 manageable switches are connected in linear fashion with root
> brdige
> at top . In the root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay is
> configured  as 6 ,1 and 4 .
> 
> 
> Issue :
>     In the sixth bridge ,learned value of max-age,hello time and forward
> delay is found as 6 ,1 and 4.But the role of the port connected to
> switch 6 alone is switching between F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated )
> 
> 
> 
>     We r using the source forge rstp source code for all 6 switches
>     From 802.1w standard,I calculated the  rcvdinfowhile timer value for
> the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done from
> updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves BPDU  for every
> hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry of
> rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D .
> 
>    What do you think about it ?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bridge-mib mailing list
> Bridge-mib@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Doubt-on-802.1w-%28max-age%29-tf3044617.html#a9098657
Sent from the IETF - Bridge-mib mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib