[Bridge-mib] FW: Static fdb table in q-bridge MIB?

-----Original Message-----
From: David Levi [mailto:dlevi@nortel.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 8:38 PM
To: Glenn Parsons; Paul Bottorff; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Wijnen, Bert
(Bert)
Subject: Static fdb table in q-bridge MIB?

Hi All,

I was just about to make an update to the table for defining static fdb
entries in the new q-bridge MIB based on .1ah clause 12.7.7.  However,
there is no such table either in the new MIB, nor in the q-bridge MIB
from RFC 4363.  However, in RFC 4363, there is a reference to an object
called 'dot1qStaticAddress' in the DESCRIPTION of dot1qTpFdbStatus in
the dot1qTpFdbTable.  Does anybody know if there is a reason why there
is no such table in RFC 4363?  Does it make sense to add such a table in
the new q-bridge MIB?

Note that there is an equivalent table in the original bridge-mib,
called the dot1dStaticTable.  Of course, that table doesn't have a fid
in the index.  Seems like that table was lost in the translation to the
q-bridge mib.

-Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------
David B. Levi             Nortel Networks    dlevi@nortelnetworks.com
Voice: +1 408 495 5138    ESN: 265-5138
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib