RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vl anid-tc-mib-00.tx t
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Thu, 01 January 2004 11:22 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA05375 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 06:22:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ac0tu-0003ed-9x for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 06:22:02 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i01BM2kK014041 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 06:22:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ac0tt-0003e6-Ip; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 06:22:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ac0tb-0003dI-Ke for bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 06:21:43 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA05350 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 06:21:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ac0tX-0004Oz-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 06:21:39 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ac0rt-0004Lc-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 06:20:00 -0500
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.222.161] helo=ihemail1.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ac0po-0004Gz-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 06:17:48 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by ihemail1.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i01BGjC12060 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 05:16:48 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <ZPPAA5T0>; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 12:16:44 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155033D2F3F@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Bridge-Mib (E-mail)" <bridge-mib@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vl anid-tc-mib-00.tx t
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:16:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
OK, but do you think that the TC specified (none, a specific one, or any) is a usefull one to have? ANd if yes, would then VlanIdReference be a proper name? Or do you have better names suggestions in that case. Would VlanIdOrNoneOrAny be better? Thanks, Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] > Sent: donderdag 1 januari 2004 9:54 > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Bridge-Mib (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t > > > VlanIdAssociation is definitely a bad name - there are other > 'VLAN associations' it may be confused with. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org > > [mailto:bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > > Sent: 31 December, 2003 6:52 PM > > To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail) > > Subject: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: > > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t > > > > > > Any comments? > > > > Thanks, > > Bert > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org] > > Sent: woensdag 31 december 2003 20:04 > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > > Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org > > Subject: Re: Please review and comment: > > draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t > > > > > > Hi Bert, > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > I think I'd call a TC with a value range of Integer32 { 0 | > 1..4094 | > > 4095 } a VlanIdReference or VlanIdAssociation. > > > > This TC would be useful when defining an object that refers > > to a vlan. > > For example, a table where each entry can be associated with > > none, one, > > or any vlan. One alternative, with the existing TCs, would > be to use > > VlanIdOrAny, but have the agent return noSuchInstance when > > there is no > > association with a vlan. Another alternative, with the > existing TCs, > > would be to use VlanIdOrNone, and not have use of the special > > any/4095 > > value. > > > > Regards, > > > > Mark > > > > Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > > > > >Sorry for late reaction... but I am now again looking at > > >this document and the discussion that we had back in October. > > > > > >inline > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org] > > >>Sent: donderdag 2 oktober 2003 20:12 > > >>To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > > >>Cc: Mark Ellison; mibs@ops.ietf.org > > >>Subject: Re: Please review and comment: > > >>draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt > > >> > > >> > > >>Hi Bert, > > >> > > >>I'm wondering if there could be any mib or pib definition > > requiring a > > >>range of ( 0 | 1..4094 | 4095 ) for possible values? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >Mark, I have not seen anyone react to this as a option that they > > >wanted, so for now I am not going to include it. > > >It can of course always be added later if a need arises. > > > > > >By the way, what woyuld you call/name that TC? > > > > > >Bert > > > > > > > > >>Regards, > > >> > > >>Mark > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bridge-mib mailing list > > Bridge-mib@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib > > > _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
- RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Andrew Smith
- Re: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Andrew Smith
- Re: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: d… Randy Presuhn