RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t

VlanIdAssociation is definitely a bad name - there are other 'VLAN associations' it may be confused with. 

Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org 
> [mailto:bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Sent: 31 December, 2003 6:52 PM
> To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> Subject: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: 
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> 
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org]
> Sent: woensdag 31 december 2003 20:04
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
> draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t
> 
> 
> Hi Bert,
> 
> Thanks for your reply. 
> 
> I think I'd call a TC with a value range of Integer32 { 0 | 1..4094 | 
> 4095 }  a VlanIdReference or VlanIdAssociation.
> 
> This TC would be useful when defining an object that refers 
> to a vlan.  
> For example, a table where each entry can be associated with 
> none, one, 
> or any vlan.  One alternative, with the existing TCs, would be to use 
> VlanIdOrAny, but have the agent return noSuchInstance when 
> there is no 
> association with a vlan. Another alternative, with the existing TCs, 
> would be to use VlanIdOrNone, and not have use of the special 
> any/4095 
> value.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mark
> 
> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> >Sorry for late reaction... but I am now again looking at 
> >this document and the discussion that we had back in October.
> >
> >inline
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org]
> >>Sent: donderdag 2 oktober 2003 20:12
> >>To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> >>Cc: Mark Ellison; mibs@ops.ietf.org
> >>Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
> >>draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi Bert,
> >>
> >>I'm wondering if there could be any mib or pib definition 
> requiring a 
> >>range of ( 0 | 1..4094 | 4095 )  for possible values?
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >Mark, I have not seen anyone react to this as a option that they
> >wanted, so for now I am not going to include it.
> >It can of course always be added later if a need arises.
> >
> >By the way, what woyuld you call/name that TC?
> >
> >Bert
> >  
> >
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Mark
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bridge-mib mailing list
> Bridge-mib@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> 

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib