RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: MIB copyright statement

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Wed, 30 July 2003 18:35 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA12171 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:35:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hvmW-0006Ot-4T for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:34:36 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6UIYaaL024592 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:34:36 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hvlw-0006NX-NP; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:34:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hvlt-0006N9-QL for bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:33:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA12122 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:33:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19hvlr-0002bw-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:33:55 -0400
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net ([209.128.82.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19hvlq-0002bt-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:33:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (heard@localhost) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6UIXmn01403; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:33:48 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: shell4.bayarea.net: heard owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Sender: heard@shell4.bayarea.net
To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
cc: bridge-mib@ietf.org, stds-802-1@ieee.org, "Scott Bradner (E-mail)" <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: MIB copyright statement
In-Reply-To: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550213BFA1@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10307301131130.18280-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > > But even if ISOC does get a non-exclusive grant of copyright, the
> > > point still stands that the standard abbreviated MIB copyright   
> > > notice would be misleading since it mentions ISOC only, and not  
> > > the IEEE, which in this case is the principal copyright holder.  
> > 
> And so we point back to the RFC for the full legal notice.
> I would personally have no problem to adapt the text somewhat
> to also indicate IEEE copy-right. But which lawyer is goin to
> formulate the proper text. The text we now use for MIB modules
> has been passed by our IETF lawyer. If we modify it for this  
> specific MIB module, I guess we need to run it by our lawyer as
> well.
  
True.  I think this discussion may have uncovered some gaps in the
submission-rights draft which is in last call, so I'm going to make
some last call comments with cc: to ipr-wg@ietf.org ... that is a
more appropriate venue for discussing this specific issue.

Thanks,

Mike


_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib