RE: [802.1] Re: [Bridge-mib] MSTP (IEEE 802.1s) MIB (or draft) ?

Hi,
I am ready to participate in this activity as a volunteer.
It seems that my edition of the draft is circulating.
Any feedbacks or/and proposition are encouraged to come
forward.

Regards, Alex

Dbh> Hi,
Dbh> 
Dbh> There has been inconsistency about whether the mib modules 
Dbh> for new 802.1
Dbh> functionality would be developed by 802.1 or by IETF's 
Dbh> Bridgemib WG. We
Dbh> are working to improve the consistency of that decision. 
Dbh> 
Dbh> The IETF Bridgemib WG has some existing work near to 
Dbh> completion, so they
Dbh> will complete it, and then the WG will probably close. All new mib
Dbh> editing work for 802.1 functionality will be done in IEEE 
Dbh> 802.1. Some of
Dbh> the IETF MIB Doctors are providing review services, at least 
Dbh> during the transition.
Dbh> 
Dbh> A number of companies have written 802.1s mib modules, and once 802.1
Dbh> has an editor to do the legwork, and the work is approved 
Dbh> within a PAR,
Dbh> that mib module work can be brought into an 802.1 effort. The 802.1 WG
Dbh> needs to assess what is still missing that should be addressed.
Dbh> 
Dbh> Volunteers to edit are encouraged to come forward.
Dbh> 
Dbh> Dbh
Dbh> David Harrington
Dbh> Acting co-chair, Bridgemib WG
Dbh> Acting MIB Doctor, IEEE 802.1
> Ali> Why does .1x (and .1aa) have MIB and .1w & .1s 
> Ali> don't? It seems, that a MIB
> Ali> is not less important here.
> Ali> 
> Ali> Is WG going to insert a MIB into new .1D?
> Ali> 
> Ali> Regards, Ali

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib