RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rstpmib-02.txt
alexr@nbase.co.il (Alex Ruzin) Sun, 31 March 2002 07:00 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12328 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 02:00:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id CAA10323 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 02:00:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA10293; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 02:00:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10247 for <bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 01:59:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apollo.nbase.co.il (apollo.nbase.co.il [194.90.137.2]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA12260 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 01:59:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Alexr ([194.90.136.135]) by apollo.nbase.co.il (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# 0-44418U200L2S100) with SMTP id AAA230; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 10:03:12 +0200
Reply-To: Arozin@Opticalaccess.com
From: alexr@nbase.co.il
To: 'Les Bell' <Les_Bell@eur.3com.com>
Cc: bridge-mib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rstpmib-02.txt
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 09:04:30 +0200
Message-ID: <002201c1d882$4e961010$87885ac2@Alexr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <80256B88.005C5D53.00@notesmta.eur.3com.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:42 PM Les Bell wrote: Les> your suggestion for separate admin and oper values for the port path Les> cost was originally made on draft-ietf-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2-02.txt, Les> not the RSTP MIB. Yes, but RSTP MIB contains the extension to bridge MIB and should have my proposition (or another solution of this problem) as a correction along with dot1dStpPathCostDefault. Les> I do understand the need to be able to configure a bridge to Les> automatically determine the path cost of a port, based on the link Les> speed, as recommended in the standards. Once you administratively Les> assign a path cost, changing it again to a value equivalent to the Les> default value is not the same as automatically determining the path Les> cost and would not give the desired result if the port re-negotiates Les> its link speed. The current MIB does not give us this capability. Yes, you understood me. Les> I would like to hear some comments from the group, either in favour, Les> or against, this proposal. Me too. Les> If in favour, should it be added to the SMIv2 Bridge MIB, or the RSTP Les> MIB? I prefer the to add it to the RSTP MIB, as the SMIv2 Bridge MIB Les> is intended only to update the language used for the SMIv1 Bridge MIB, Les> not to extend the mib. As I pointed above, I think, that you are right, and it should be added to RSTP MIB. Apropos, what about MSTP MIB? Thank you for an attention to my remarks, yours sincerely, Alex _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
- [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rstpmib… Internet-Drafts
- RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rst… Alex Ruzin
- RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rst… Ngai, Vivian
- RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rst… Les Bell
- RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rst… Alex Ruzin
- RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-rst… Alex Ruzin