[Bridge-mib] IETF-54 meeting

"Les Bell" <Les_Bell@eur.3com.com> Mon, 08 July 2002 15:01 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA18128 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:01:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id LAA23029 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA23017; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:02:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA22986 for <bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:02:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from columba.www.eur.3com.com (ip-161-71-171-238.corp-eur.3com.com []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA18114 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:01:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from toucana.eur.3com.com (toucana.EUR.3Com.COM []) by columba.www.eur.3com.com with ESMTP id g68F3oE03722; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:03:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from notesmta.eur.3com.com (eurmta1.EUR.3Com.COM []) by toucana.eur.3com.com with SMTP id g68F2cR11598; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:02:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: by notesmta.eur.3com.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (733.2 10-16-1998)) id 80256BF0.0052F72C ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:06:12 +0100
X-Lotus-FromDomain: 3COM
From: "Les Bell" <Les_Bell@eur.3com.com>
To: bridge-mib@ietf.org
cc: bwijnen@lucent.com, randy@psg.com
Message-ID: <80256BF0.0052F430.00@notesmta.eur.3com.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:55:51 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Bridge-mib] IETF-54 meeting
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org

I have booked a slot in the schedule for the Bridge-MIB WG in Yokohama.
However, as the document editors/authors cannot attend the meeting, and I
believe the current drafts are ready to go for a last call, I wanted to get the
opinion of the Working Group as to whether there is any need to go ahead with
this meeting.  I am also unable to attend the meeting, but Dan Romascanu has
volunteered to chair the meeting in my absence, if required.

No-one has raised any issues for the agenda so far.  If you feel that there is a
need to hold a meeting in Yokohama, then please reply to the mailing list by end
of Wednesday, 10th July, and please state what it is we need to discuss.

The current drafts are:

Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges

Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges with Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol

Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges with TrafficClasses, Multicast
Filtering and Virtual LAN Extensions

Definitions for Port Access Control (IEEE 802.1X) MIB


Bridge-mib mailing list