Re: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2-03.txt

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Alex Ruzin wrote:
>It seems to me, that the object dot1dStpPortEnable doesn't reflect a *port
>state* as it is defined in "IEEE 802.1D-1998: Section 8.5.5.2"; rather it
>correspondents to "Force port state" from Section 14.8.2.2.
>I propose to discuss an option to:
>1) do this object "MAX-ACCESS  write-only"
>2) set possible values as
>        SYNTAX      INTEGER {
>                        forceBlock(1),
>                        forceDisable(2)
>                    }
>3) change REFERENCE: "IEEE 802.1D-1998: Section 14.8.2.2"

See RFC 2578 page 9, in SMIv2 MAX-ACCESS does not support "write-only "

Mike MacFaden


_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib