[Bridge-mib] RE: Support of LAN FCS in Ethernet packet over ATM AAL5.

Nurit Sprecher <nurit.sprecher@SeabridgeNetworks.com> Thu, 27 June 2002 08:18 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA05958 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id EAA11110 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:19:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA11091; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin []) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA10770 for <bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:13:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tiger.seabridge.co.il ([]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA05821; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:13:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by tiger.seabridge.co.il with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <NCYM0L6F>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:29:44 +0200
Message-ID: <C87E5A01714C7840B92CDED9E79329CA51F65A@leopard.seabridge.co.il>
From: Nurit Sprecher <nurit.sprecher@SeabridgeNetworks.com>
To: Nurit Sprecher <nurit.sprecher@SeabridgeNetworks.com>, "'Manuel Stol'" <ManuelS@AlliedData.com>, "'PPPoE Mailing List (E-mail)'" <pppoe@ipsec.org>
Cc: "'bridge-mib@ietf.org'" <bridge-mib@ietf.org>, "'hubmib@ietf.org'" <hubmib@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:29:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
Subject: [Bridge-mib] RE: Support of LAN FCS in Ethernet packet over ATM AAL5.
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org

One more question please. 
In case that the LAN FCS is not supported (e.g. in LLC encapsulation format
the PID is 0x00-07), does the LAN FCS appear in the packet with arbitrary
value? I guess that the LAN FCS does not appear in the packet at all in such
a case. Can you please confirm it?
Thanks again, Nurit.

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Nurit Sprecher  
		Sent:	Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:19 AM
		To:	'Manuel Stol'; PPPoE Mailing List (E-mail)
		Cc:	'bridge-mib@ietf.org'.org'; 'hubmib@ietf.org'
		Subject:	Support of  LAN FCS in Ethernet packet over

		In RFC 2684 on Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM
Adaptation Layer 5, the Payload Format for Bridged Ethernet/802.3 PDUs is
defined as follows:

		                |    MAC destination address    |
		                |                               |
		                |   (remainder of MAC frame)    |
		                |                               |
		                |  LAN FCS (if PID is 0x00-01)  |
		The LAN FCS option is VC dependent. 
		In case that the LAN FCS is supported, duplicate checksum
calculations are performed: one for the AAL5 frame and one for the Ethernet

		In what cases is it required/suggested/worth to support the
LAN FCS when transmitting a packet within an AAL5 packet over an ATM

		Can a bridge that resides at the end of the ATM,
de-capsulate the ATM packet and transmit the Ethernet packet over a LAN,
calculate the LAN FCS and set it in the Ethernet packet (if required)?

		Thanks in advance, 
		Nurit Sprecher

Bridge-mib mailing list