[Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 06 May 2003 17:46 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA01089 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h46HtCN12870 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:55:12 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h46Ht1812853; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:55:01 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h46HoZ812677 for <bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:50:35 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA00972 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19D6TX-0000yJ-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Tue, 06 May 2003 13:43:35 -0400
Received: from hoemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.226.161] helo=hoemail1.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19D6TW-0000xa-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Tue, 06 May 2003 13:43:34 -0400
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by hoemail1.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id h46HhsY21173 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 May 2003 13:43:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <2R199SLZ>; Tue, 6 May 2003 19:43:53 +0200
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155018B868A@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: Les Bell <Les_Bell@eur.3com.com>, Andrew Smith <ah_smith@acm.org>
Cc: "'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "'Bridge-Mib (E-mail)'" <bridge-mib@ietf.org>, mibs@ops.ietf.org
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 19:43:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Les, Did you get any feedback after that March 9th meeting? If not, Can you poll Mick Seaman? Thanks, Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Les Bell [mailto:Les_Bell@eur.3com.com] > Sent: vrijdag 28 februari 2003 17:27 > To: Andrew Smith > Cc: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; 'Bridge-Mib (E-mail)'; mibs@ops.ietf.org > Subject: RE: VLAn ID > > > > > > I have asked for the opinion of the IEEE 802.1 Task Force > Chair, Mick Seaman, on > this proposal. He believes that the use of 4095 as a > wildcard VLAN-ID would be > okay, but he wants to discuss it formally at the IEEE 802 > meeting in Dallas > (week commencing March 9). I will be attending this meeting. > > Les... > > > > > > "Andrew Smith" <ah_smith@acm.org> on 27/02/2003 17:53:56 > > Sent by: "Andrew Smith" <ah_smith@acm.org> > > > To: "'Wijnen, Bert \ > cc: "'Bridge-Mib \, mibs@ops.ietf.org (Les Bell/GB/3Com) > Subject: RE: VLAn ID > > > > > Bert, > > The whole point of defining these TCs in a separate document > is to serve > "possible future (yet-undefined) needs" - why else would we bother to > break them out in a separate document or module? > > The need to use VlanIdOrAny as an index in the future seems likely to > me. It is especially likely if you believe that we're trying to set a > precedent here for how to represent "some sort of packet field or > don't-care". Personally, I think it's a bit clunky to > overload the value > like this - a separate flag object is more elegant, but, if we're > comfortable with the overloading, I'd go with Randy and say (as I did > before - maybe you missed my message?) that the syntax here should be > unsigned, not signed (I understand the practical reasons for the > non-negative-index restriction in SNMP but it is a limitation on the > SMIv2 language). I don't think there's a need to consult with IEEE 802 > on this - I think most of the people with relevant opinions > on this are > already on this thread - but that's the bridge-mib WG chair's > call if he > wants to ask himself for help. > > My opinions (I know you're looking for others though ...). > > Andrew > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-mibs@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mibs@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert) Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:36 AM To: Randy Presuhn (E-mail) Cc: Bridge-Mib (E-mail); mibs@ops.ietf.org Subject: VLAn ID Randy, you wrote: >To: bridge-mib@ietf.org >cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org (Les Bell/GB/3Com) >Subject: Re: [Bridge-mib] VLAN-ID > >Hi - > >I think it would be better if the "any" value in the *OrAny TC were >a non-negative value so that the type could be used to define an >index. There may not be a need today, but thinking ahead to >representing policy-like things wouldn't hurt. > As far as I can tell, you seem to be the only one sofar who has spoken up on the idea of not having a negative value for the "any" for the VlanIdOrAny TC that I proposed. You do not claim an immediate need, but a possible future (yet-undefined) need. S _______________________________________________ Bridge-mib mailing list Bridge-mib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
- [Bridge-mib] VLAn ID Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- [Bridge-mib] Re: VLAn ID Tom Petch
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Andrew Smith
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Les Bell
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Les Bell
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Tony Jeffree
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID C. M. Heard
- Re: [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Les Bell
- RE: [Bridge-mib] RE: VLAn ID Wijnen, Bert (Bert)