RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-8021x-02.txt

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Tue, 29 July 2003 15:12 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25962 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:12:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hW8g-0006Lm-Bb for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:11:46 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6TFBkVg024400 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:11:46 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hW7w-0006JN-Tk; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:11:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19hW7c-0006IO-IA for bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:10:40 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25850 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:10:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19hW7Z-0006OK-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:10:37 -0400
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net ([209.128.82.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19hW7Y-0006O8-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:10:37 -0400
Received: from localhost (heard@localhost) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6TF9vH09854; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:09:57 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: shell4.bayarea.net: heard owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-Sender: heard@shell4.bayarea.net
To: bridge-mib@ietf.org
cc: stds-802-1@ieee.org
Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-8021x-02.txt
In-Reply-To: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550213BC8F@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10307290745100.1107-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> I think we still want to have a copyright statement in the 
> DESCRIPTION of the MODULE-IDENTITY. Since it points back to the
> RFC, it will point to proper text, no?

I would think that is the IEEE's call, since it is their MIB
module, after all.  The original version of the MIB module at

http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/MIBs/802-1x-2001-mib.txt

which we are republishing (with only very minor changes so that it
will compile) does not have a copyright statement.  I'm proposing
that we keep the MIB module in the informational RFC as close to
the one on the IEEE web site as possible.  (Ideally the version
in the RFC and the version on the web site would be identical,
which is why I've suggested that we urge the IEEE to incorporate
the corrections we've made into their on-line version.)

Thanks,

Mike


_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib