RE: [Bridge-mib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-8021x-02.txt

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> I think we still want to have a copyright statement in the 
> DESCRIPTION of the MODULE-IDENTITY. Since it points back to the
> RFC, it will point to proper text, no?

I would think that is the IEEE's call, since it is their MIB
module, after all.  The original version of the MIB module at

http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/MIBs/802-1x-2001-mib.txt

which we are republishing (with only very minor changes so that it
will compile) does not have a copyright statement.  I'm proposing
that we keep the MIB module in the informational RFC as close to
the one on the IEEE web site as possible.  (Ideally the version
in the RFC and the version on the web site would be identical,
which is why I've suggested that we urge the IEEE to incorporate
the corrections we've made into their on-line version.)

Thanks,

Mike

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib