RE: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Sun, 07 September 2003 18:15 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA25624 for <bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 14:15:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19w43y-0005f4-Ln for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 14:15:02 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h87IF2Oe021744 for bridge-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 14:15:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19w43y-0005ea-0e; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 14:15:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19w43V-0005dp-A0 for bridge-mib@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 14:14:33 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA25558 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 14:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19w43S-0004HM-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 14:14:30 -0400
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.222.163] helo=ihemail2.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19w43S-0004D0-00 for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 14:14:30 -0400
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by ihemail2.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id h87IDvJ02892 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:13:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <RYHC31FD>; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 20:13:56 +0200
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155023314FD@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: "'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Bridge-Mib (E-mail)" <bridge-mib@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 20:13:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <bridge-mib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Not sure if they need it or not, but it would be to
indicate "wildcard", not "none"

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> Sent: zondag 7 september 2003 10:55
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
> 
> 
> So, I guess that the IPCDN people do not need 4095. 
> 
> Otherwise, it looks OK to me. 
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> > Sent: 07 September, 2003 10:29 AM
> > To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> > Subject: FW: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
> > 
> > 
> > It seems that in IPCDN, some people would like
> > to see yet another TC, namely:
> > 
> >     VlanIdOrZero      ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
> >         DISPLAY-HINT "d"
> >         STATUS        current
> >         DESCRIPTION  "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN.
> > 
> >                       The value zero is NOT a valid VLAN ID. 
> >                       
> >                       When this textual convention is used as the
> >                       syntax of an object, the object definition
> >                       MUST specify in the DESCRIPTION clause what
> >                       the value zero means.
> >                      "
> >         SYNTAX        Integer32 (0 | 1..4094)
> > 
> > Does anyone see a problem with that?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bert 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> > Sent: vrijdag 5 september 2003 0:48
> > To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> > Subject: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
> > 
> > 
> > So... nobody has reacted to my request for
> > writeup. So I am preparing to do an ID myself.
> > 
> > This is what I think the discussion boiled down to.
> > 
> >     VlanId            ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
> >         DISPLAY-HINT "d"
> >         STATUS        current
> >         DESCRIPTION  "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN."
> >         SYNTAX        Integer32 (1..4094)
> > 
> > 
> >     VlanIdOrAny       ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
> >         DISPLAY-HINT "d"
> >         STATUS        current
> >         DESCRIPTION  "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN.
> >                       The value of 4095 is used to indicate a 
> > wildcard,
> >                       i.e. any value.
> >                      "
> >         SYNTAX        Integer32 (1..4094 | 4095)
> > 
> > Any comments?
> > 
> > Bert
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bridge-mib mailing list
> > Bridge-mib@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bridge-mib mailing list
> > Bridge-mib@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib