Re: [btns] RFC 5660 on IPsec Channels: Connection Latching

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> Wed, 28 October 2009 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
X-Original-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C203028C1FE for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IpsFvPekyUC7 for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com (sca-ea-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.43.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C139328C104 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm-central-01.central.sun.com ([129.147.62.4]) by sca-ea-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n9SL1FQ0005490 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:01:15 GMT
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104]) by dm-central-01.central.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id n9SL1Ekw064889 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:01:14 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9SKnmFB002756; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:49:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from nw141292@localhost) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id n9SKnmqK002755; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:49:48 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: binky.Central.Sun.COM: nw141292 set sender to Nicolas.Williams@sun.com using -f
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:49:48 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <20091028204947.GE1105@Sun.COM>
References: <20091028191911.54E06356BC1@bosco.isi.edu> <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C648CA517@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C648CA517@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
Cc: "btns@ietf.org" <btns@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [btns] RFC 5660 on IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:01:02 -0000

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:41:27PM -0700, Laganier, Julien wrote:
> >         URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5660.txt
> 
> Congratulations Nico!
> 
> And thanks to those that made this possible.

The RFC has an acknodlegements section listing a number of WG
participants who made critical contributions.  This RFC could not
possibly have been published without their help.  Thank you all so much!

Nico
--