[anonsec] Status update of BTNS drafts.

Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net> Wed, 20 February 2008 10:35 UTC

Return-Path: <anonsec-bounces@postel.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E033A6BF7 for <ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:35:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.091, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1kfJny4Sebi for <ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EFD3A6968 for <btns-archive-waDah9Oh@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1KAPT48028266; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:25:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1KAOmnF027904 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1819621fga.13 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:24:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; bh=71LXWBn++UUoxD/h9pIqwyiS/FNko6Y3FG0Qp0woDw0=; b=Pv+KX/xSpHwk0I40g6vpyCxlusE7YG5SMryWBB/I2KWnNPpuMgHN09kdIDdKtrkw+gHocKEJXGU0tMVUUHoNfxucyDjJ7GUQpZKzUtP5FScghefB03MGUxsv5Nu+p7F4QSR0T8JnY0vYXgdksah8UXQuVaxnzWErFr8sCirJCCI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=fvK0OliqPQaGZnfwalQzw2YDX6yHx5tyMWdfEJAdqYN+OzsaN+3rsLepN6WwqCxVgecc8mB21mjFF1fy2x8aeAdgpLwZuYog77439CNqLEJWdUDydHjbxYEOlwPXADhLFZYlQteKmGb+5VCB5jkVM4JUe+CebFOwWUYBXlVBmBE=
Received: by 10.78.154.14 with SMTP id b14mr13040418hue.63.1203503087452; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ubik.local ( [212.119.9.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1756537nfv.35.2008.02.20.02.24.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:24:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net>
To: anonsec@postel.org
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:25:07 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200802201125.08177.julien.IETF@laposte.net>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: julien.laganier@gmail.com
Cc: btns-ads@tools.ietf.org, Love =?iso-8859-1?q?H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?= <lha@it.su.se>
Subject: [anonsec] Status update of BTNS drafts.
X-BeenThere: anonsec@postel.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of anonymous Internet security." <anonsec.postel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/anonsec>, <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec>
List-Post: <mailto:anonsec@postel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/anonsec>, <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: anonsec-bounces@postel.org
Errors-To: anonsec-bounces@postel.org

Folks,

This is a brief update on the status of our deliverables:

- AS/PS: is in IESG resolving IETF LC comments (most notably Steve 
Kent's review of ASPS)

- Core: is in IESG, resolving one SEC AD DISCUSS.

I don't expect any major difficulty with the two above.
 
- Connection latching: We will soon get an additional review of 
conn-latch from the transport area directorate. Then we can proceed to 
WGLC, and then forward it to IESG.
 
- APIs: I am currently trying to get APP area folks to review APIs 
draft. Stay tuned.

--julien
_______________________________________________