IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [btns] Security UDT

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 27 August 2010 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973643A6948 for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3OZzjVPwXivJ for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0233A6943 for <btns@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.35.1.127] (pc3.shinagawaphvod2-unet.ocn.ne.jp [220.110.141.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7RKt03o015205 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C78261D.9000704@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:54:53 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DB <dbernard@ozonline.com.au>
References: <20091015221608.GC907@Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DF98@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com><20091016203953.GQ892@Sun.COM><BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C2A67DFC1@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> <20091016211652.GV892@Sun.COM> <2A5090A900C84CBCBF98A5C2D900EF88@DanielPC>
In-Reply-To: <2A5090A900C84CBCBF98A5C2D900EF88@DanielPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: btns@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [btns] Security UDT
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:55:07 -0000

10/21/2009 I responded to a similar request indicating that UDT was out 
of scope for BTNS, based on the charter at that time.

The WG has since concluded.

Joe

On 10/21/2009 1:51 PM, DB wrote:
> I dont know how this WG works, but could this be included in your next
> agenda?
> I need your inputs and comments,
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-d-sec-udt-00
>
> _______________________________________________
> btns mailing list
> btns@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email