Re: [anonsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-06.txt

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> Thu, 10 April 2008 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <anonsec-bounces@postel.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C873A6E85 for <ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RrWIh-QboFZO for <ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C763A6E75 for <btns-archive-waDah9Oh@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3A4QwS1011717; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com (sca-ea-mail-3.Sun.COM [192.18.43.21]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3A4Q0LL011242 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm-central-01.central.sun.com ([129.147.62.4]) by sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m3A4Q0aE023320 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:26:00 GMT
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104]) by dm-central-01.central.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id m3A4Pxh9028500 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:26:00 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m3A4Pupk008473; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:25:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from nw141292@localhost) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id m3A4Puwl008472; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:25:56 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: binky.Central.Sun.COM: nw141292 set sender to Nicolas.Williams@sun.com using -f
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:25:56 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@orange-ftgroup.com>, Daniel Migault <mglt.biz@gmail.com>, anonsec@postel.org
Message-ID: <20080410042555.GF8027@Sun.COM>
Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@orange-ftgroup.com>, Daniel Migault <mglt.biz@gmail.com>, anonsec@postel.org
References: <20080225093002.01ABB3A6CB2@core3.amsl.com> <c17ec2f80803132253k6442ec40m99be1872704f5c5a@mail.gmail.com> <20080407180003.GB16998@Sun.COM> <20080408173036.GS16998@Sun.COM> <47FCD94F.6040108@orange-ftgroup.com> <20080409155138.GC16998@Sun.COM> <20080409170021.GE16998@Sun.COM> <47FCFFEA.7020004@orange-ftgroup.com> <20080409173633.GF16998@Sun.COM> <20080409181238.GG16998@Sun.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080409181238.GG16998@Sun.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: nicolas.williams@sun.com
Subject: Re: [anonsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-06.txt
X-BeenThere: anonsec@postel.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of anonymous Internet security." <anonsec.postel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/anonsec>, <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec>
List-Post: <mailto:anonsec@postel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/anonsec>, <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: anonsec-bounces@postel.org
Errors-To: anonsec-bounces@postel.org

Thinking it over, the SUSPENDED and BROKEN states differ only in whether
an implementation supports transitioning from SUSPENDED to ESTABLISHED.

That difference is too small to warrant two states.

So I'm going to merge those two states.  That will make the state
diagram simpler.

Nico
-- 
_______________________________________________