Re: [anonsec] Typo in core draft

[Nicolas Williams <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:23:28PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> +   bind the same public key.  These certificates need not to have been
> +   pre-shared with their peers (e.g., because ephermal, self-signed).
> 
> 
> The current text sounds like a requirement that certificates are not
> shared with peers.  I think it's more like "These certificates do not
> need to be "

Yes, that's correct -- the word "do" is missing and should be inserted
before "need to be".

> Am I correct on this point?  If so, feel free to either submit a new
> ID or give me an rfc editor note to apply in the tracker.

The note is this:

    Add the word "do" before "need to" in the last sentence of the
    parapgraph that starts "Nodes wishing to be treated as BTNS
    nodes..." in section 2.

> Either way I'll put this on the agenda for next week.

Thanks.
_______________________________________________