[btns] [Errata Verified] RFC5660 (4051)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 20 January 2022 01:34 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: btns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F093A12F6; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:34:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m093z5s3pwNU; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC52D3A12F4; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 115AFECB77; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:34:17 -0800 (PST)
To: watsonbladd@gmail.com, Nicolas.Williams@sun.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rdd@cert.org, iesg@ietf.org, btns@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220120013417.115AFECB77@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:34:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/btns/_34JlSNa8HqiSECfWRlnDGblOuk>
Subject: [btns] [Errata Verified] RFC5660 (4051)
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/btns/>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 01:34:24 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5660, "IPsec Channels: Connection Latching". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4051 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2014-07-16 Verified by: Roman Danyliw (IESG) Section: 2.2 Original Text ------------- Connection latches can exist in any of the following five states: Corrected Text -------------- Connection latches can exist in any of the following four states: Notes ----- This sentence is followed by a list with four elements, not five. The state machine diagram also has four states, not five. -------------------------------------- RFC5660 (draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-11) -------------------------------------- Title : IPsec Channels: Connection Latching Publication Date : October 2009 Author(s) : N. Williams Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Better-Than-Nothing Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [btns] [Errata Verified] RFC5660 (4051) RFC Errata System