Re: [anonsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-06.txt

Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> Wed, 09 April 2008 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <anonsec-bounces@postel.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B544A3A67FF for <ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.153, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVkK8v8MFdd4 for <ietfarch-btns-archive-waDah9Oh@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CDD3A6F01 for <btns-archive-waDah9Oh@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m39Hau8h029370; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com (sca-ea-mail-3.Sun.COM [192.18.43.21]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m39Hae29029320 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm-central-01.central.sun.com ([129.147.62.4]) by sca-ea-mail-3.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m39HaZdc026743 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:36:40 GMT
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104]) by dm-central-01.central.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id m39HaYJc007045 for <anonsec@postel.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:36:35 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m39HaYFO006794; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:36:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from nw141292@localhost) by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id m39HaXT3006793; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:36:33 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: binky.Central.Sun.COM: nw141292 set sender to Nicolas.Williams@sun.com using -f
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:36:33 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@orange-ftgroup.com>
Message-ID: <20080409173633.GF16998@Sun.COM>
Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@orange-ftgroup.com>, Daniel Migault <mglt.biz@gmail.com>, anonsec@postel.org
References: <20080225093002.01ABB3A6CB2@core3.amsl.com> <c17ec2f80803132253k6442ec40m99be1872704f5c5a@mail.gmail.com> <20080407180003.GB16998@Sun.COM> <20080408173036.GS16998@Sun.COM> <47FCD94F.6040108@orange-ftgroup.com> <20080409155138.GC16998@Sun.COM> <20080409170021.GE16998@Sun.COM> <47FCFFEA.7020004@orange-ftgroup.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47FCFFEA.7020004@orange-ftgroup.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: nicolas.williams@sun.com
Cc: anonsec@postel.org
Subject: Re: [anonsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-06.txt
X-BeenThere: anonsec@postel.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of anonymous Internet security." <anonsec.postel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/anonsec>, <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/anonsec>
List-Post: <mailto:anonsec@postel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/anonsec>, <mailto:anonsec-request@postel.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: anonsec-bounces@postel.org
Errors-To: anonsec-bounces@postel.org

On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 07:42:02PM +0200, Daniel Migault wrote:
> It sounds good for me, maybe we should also add dot lines with the 
> CREATE_CONNECTION_LATCH function.

Consider it done.

> Can the LISTEN state be considered as something like a "larval state"? 

Yes.

> Should we introduce in the same manner a CONNECTION state so that 
> listeners  and connections object have similar state architecture?

I guess I could.  I'll play with it.  This diagram is fairly busy though
and I want to keep it simple.  It needn't capture every subtlety :)

Nico
-- 
_______________________________________________