[btns] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5660 (4051)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 16 July 2014 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: btns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9C11A014B for <btns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IuAzrYRaDNqI for <btns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DDE1A0126 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 38F0D18001B; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nicolas.Williams@sun.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, julienl@qualcomm.com, lha@stacken.kth.se
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140716175143.38F0D18001B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/btns/v8dVgAwUnY_HoBqaPgp1VTz4rdI
Cc: watsonbladd@gmail.com, btns@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [btns] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5660 (4051)
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/btns/>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:52:37 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5660,
"IPsec Channels: Connection Latching".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5660&eid=4051

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>

Section: 2.2

Original Text
-------------
Connection latches can exist in any of the following five states:

Corrected Text
--------------
Connection latches can exist in any of the following four states:

Notes
-----
This sentence is followed by a list with four elements, not five. The state machine diagram also has four states, not five.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5660 (draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
Publication Date    : October 2009
Author(s)           : N. Williams
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Better-Than-Nothing Security
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG