[btns] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5660 (4051)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 16 July 2014 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: btns@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9C11A014B for <btns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.553
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IuAzrYRaDNqI for <btns@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DDE1A0126 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 38F0D18001B; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nicolas.Williams@sun.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, julienl@qualcomm.com, lha@stacken.kth.se
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140716175143.38F0D18001B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/btns/v8dVgAwUnY_HoBqaPgp1VTz4rdI
Cc: watsonbladd@gmail.com, btns@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [btns] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5660 (4051)
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/btns/>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:52:37 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5660,
"IPsec Channels: Connection Latching".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Editorial
Reported by: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>

Section: 2.2

Original Text
Connection latches can exist in any of the following five states:

Corrected Text
Connection latches can exist in any of the following four states:

This sentence is followed by a list with four elements, not five. The state machine diagram also has four states, not five.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC5660 (draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-11)
Title               : IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
Publication Date    : October 2009
Author(s)           : N. Williams
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Better-Than-Nothing Security
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG