IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bundled-domain-names] A lightweight and semantics-free proposal to signal aliasing

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 15 November 2016 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B431129404 for <bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:25:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0wqTpxpFwiWq for <bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:25:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC31127A91 for <bundled-domain-names@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:25:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.158] ([211.44.215.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id uAFMOo0j018322 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <bundled-domain-names@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:24:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host [211.44.215.72] claimed to be [10.32.60.158]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: bundled-domain-names@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:25:02 +0900
Message-ID: <0C7F9865-4885-446B-A890-3801CE9194F7@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161114131643.GA13407@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20161114131643.GA13407@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5263)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bundled-domain-names/VNxJRy7XCPTD8Ka7vJgBJtWzgsw>
Subject: Re: [Bundled-domain-names] A lightweight and semantics-free proposal to signal aliasing
X-BeenThere: bundled-domain-names@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of \"bundled domain names\"" <bundled-domain-names.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bundled-domain-names>, <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bundled-domain-names/>
List-Post: <mailto:bundled-domain-names@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bundled-domain-names>, <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:25:04 -0000

The idea that clients need to do a second lookup seems completely weird 
to me. It would take decades (at best) before most clients did this and, 
in the interim, a bundle would not be found. That seems to go against 
all the language-based use cases.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email