Re: [Bundled-domain-names] A lightweight and semantics-free proposal to signal aliasing

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 15 November 2016 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2203712969A for <bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dlfrfGgQECIx for <bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBC9412956F for <bundled-domain-names@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:24:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 793B431D5D; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:24:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2460EC0B27; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:20:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:20:14 +0900
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <20161115022014.GB27646@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20161114131643.GA13407@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20161108193731.17863.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161108193731.17863.qmail@ary.lan>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bundled-domain-names/gfFY4gPAwu7pp4Lgq6HVjTjHHfY>
Cc: bundled-domain-names@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Bundled-domain-names] A lightweight and semantics-free proposal to signal aliasing
X-BeenThere: bundled-domain-names@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of \"bundled domain names\"" <bundled-domain-names.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bundled-domain-names>, <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bundled-domain-names/>
List-Post: <mailto:bundled-domain-names@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bundled-domain-names>, <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:24:31 -0000

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:37:31PM -0000,
 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote 
 a message of 26 lines which said:

> other.example. ALIAS main.example.
> 
> main.example. SAILA other.example.
> 
> Now I look up www.other.example, which I presume is supposed to be
> substitutable for www.main.example.

Yes.

> Tree walk?

Yes. May be helped by some optimisations from a public suffix list.

> Magic extra stuff in the DNS response?

No, the idea is to use unmodified name servers (resolvers or auths).

> PS: This proposal looks a lot like a simpler version of Andrew's SOPA
> proposal,

draft-sullivan-domain-policy-authority ? If so, _I_ am confused, SOPA
does not describe aliases/substitutable domain names, and it
explicitely does not work unless names are contiguous in the tree
("The target name SHOULD be either an ancestor, a descendent, or a
sibling of the owner name in the record.")