IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bundled-domain-names] A lightweight and semantics-free proposal to signal aliasing

Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> Tue, 15 November 2016 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Original-To: bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956CD129665 for <bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:09:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id veHDqX4nSOrf for <bundled-domain-names@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time-travellers.nl.eu.org (c.time-travellers.nl.eu.org [IPv6:2a02:2770::21a:4aff:fea3:eeaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70AE0129621 for <bundled-domain-names@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [221.147.10.131] (helo=pallas.home.time-travellers.org) by time-travellers.nl.eu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <shane@time-travellers.org>) id 1c6TBy-0006Z6-V2; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:09:47 +0000
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:09:11 +0900
From: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Message-ID: <20161115110911.52a489af@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161114131643.GA13407@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20161114131643.GA13407@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; boundary="Sig_/JYEJPj3jLJGxICNBdQSAIah"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bundled-domain-names/zKUZUY_5hBbFwjxoiImh3ffXXN8>
Cc: bundled-domain-names@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Bundled-domain-names] A lightweight and semantics-free proposal to signal aliasing
X-BeenThere: bundled-domain-names@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of \"bundled domain names\"" <bundled-domain-names.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bundled-domain-names>, <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bundled-domain-names/>
List-Post: <mailto:bundled-domain-names@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bundled-domain-names>, <mailto:bundled-domain-names-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:09:34 -0000

Stephane,

At 2016-11-14 22:16:43 +0900
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:

> Following the discussion this evening in Seoul. If you have time to
> read it before the BoF on Wednesday...
> 
> I'll formally present it at the BoF if there is interest.

With the draft as written, a client has to explicitly request the ALIAS
record, right? Does it make sense to include this in the additional
section of an NXDOMAIN response to avoid this extra query?

Cheers,

--
Shane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email