IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Tue, 18 May 2021 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71CAF407D9; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.01, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BmJGia6MZAwz; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0605F407D0; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EB838A053; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrsKTcEt200R; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AMSs-MBP.localdomain (unknown [47.186.1.92]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90A3D38A052; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, 'Erik Kline' <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Charlie Perkins' <charliep@computer.org>, 'RFC Errata System' <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, satishnaidu80@gmail.com, "'S.V.R.Anand'" <anandsvr@iisc.ac.in>, 'Malati Hegde' <malati@iisc.ac.in>, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, 6lo-ads@ietf.org, c310@rfc-editor.org, shwetha.bhandari@gmail.com
References: <20210513181917.B37DEF4074D@rfc-editor.org> <005001d74b19$62bcb980$28362c80$@cdac.in> <c3ecb73f-dea6-330f-5c67-2baa39cac6d2@amsl.com> <b92c3841-2ad1-533d-6f7c-18265fa071c3@computer.org> <bc14c994-1962-1d12-4587-2de37e07fb42@amsl.com> <CAMGpriXrE1B6Cg6U8pY7CJ5mHoxpAhjpVXzRttZxm+GPwLmA4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriVPVLAS9FfwiqES3-o=NB4bjQC3wgozj40BZ5OS8Q22mQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriUeN56VQqFFv2VqP=BGS0_+LKN5gWZCsW6NaBoVm52sCw@mail.gmail.com> <001e01d74bb2$00419980$00c4cc80$@cdac.in>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
Message-ID: <38221504-ea72-7161-d9f0-bcb3784eddfc@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 08:50:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <001e01d74bb2$00419980$00c4cc80$@cdac.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8072824DDC4CB8E2221E9EF5"
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:50:51 -0000

Lijo and Erik,

We'll wait further word from you before making updates.

Best regards,

RFC Editor/jm


On 5/18/21 1:49 AM, Lijo Thomas wrote:
>
> Yes Erik, you are correct, we observe some discrepancy . We are 
> currently merging the things properly. Somehow we missed that 
> communications and it was very important to integrate those corrections.
>
> Thanks and special mention for you to pointing out that.
>
> @ Jean – Kindly hold the further proceedings until we get back.
>
> *  Thanks & Regards,*
>
> *  Lijo Thomas *
>
> *From:*Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 18 May 2021 12:11
> *To:* Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
> *Cc:* Charlie Perkins <charliep@computer.org>; Lijo Thomas 
> <lijo@cdac.in>; RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; 
> satishnaidu80@gmail.com; S.V.R.Anand <anandsvr@iisc.ac.in>; Malati 
> Hegde <malati@iisc.ac.in>; 6lo-chairs@ietf.org; 6lo-ads@ietf.org; 
> c310@rfc-editor.org; shwetha.bhandari@gmail.com
> *Subject:* Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 
> <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
>
> Specifically, I'm wondering if we can give quick consideration to the 
> topics here before final publication:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MPf1zwq5KtY_tBspdH0JEW0yHPs/ 
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MPf1zwq5KtY_tBspdH0JEW0yHPs/>
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:04 PM Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com 
> <mailto:ek.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Actually, can I put things on pause until inclusion of some
>     modular arithmetic fixes are merged (if they haven't been already)?
>
>     On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:01 PM Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com
>     <mailto:ek.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         I've had a look over
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-diff.html
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-diff.html> and
>         everything LGTM.
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         -ek
>
>
> 150th Anniversary Mahatma Gandhi
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>
> [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
>
> This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
> is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email