Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

[Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]>]

Erik,

Thank you for your response. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 
status page:

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9034

As approvals are now complete, this document will move forward in the 
publication process at this time.

Best regards,

RFC Editor/jm


On 6/4/21 6:28 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
> Jean,
>
> Please record my approval for this document.
>
> Thanks for your patience,
> -Erik
>
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 2:19 PM Erik Kline <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Jean.
>
>     This does seem like a sizable chunk of new text.
>
>     I've put a few thoughts/questions to the 6lo chairs in a separate
>     thread.
>
>     Hopefully I'll have an answer for you shortly.
>
>     Thanks again,
>     -Erik
>
>     On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 6:48 AM Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>         Lijo and *Erik,
>
>         *Erik, please review the new text and let us know if you approve:
>
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-auth48rfcdiff.html
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-auth48rfcdiff.html>
>
>         Lijo, thank you for the updated draft. We have incorporated
>         the changes:
>
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-lastrfcdiff.html
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-lastrfcdiff.html>
>
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.txt
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.txt>
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.pdf
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.pdf>
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.html
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.html>
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.xml
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.xml>
>
>         We have also noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>
>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9034
>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9034>
>
>         Thank you!
>         RFC Editor/jm
>
>         On 5/21/21 2:03 AM, [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>         wrote:
>>         Hello Jean,
>>
>>         We have updated the suggestions mentioned in the below email
>>         and the latest draft is attached herewith.    I have some
>>         issue with my official email ID, hence using my personal ID.
>>
>>         ***Kindly review and you may proceed with this update.*
>>
>>         Please get back if you have further clarifications if any.
>>
>>         Thanks for the understanding and support !!!
>>
>>         * Thanks & Regards,*
>>
>>         * Lijo Thomas *
>>
>>         *From:*Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]>
>>         <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>         *Sent:* 20 May 2021 01:26
>>         *To:* Lijo Thomas <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>; 'Erik
>>         Kline' <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>         *Cc:* 'Charlie Perkins' <[e-mail]>
>>         <mailto:[e-mail]>; 'RFC Errata System'
>>         <[e-mail]>
>>         <mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
>>         <mailto:[e-mail]>; 'S.V.R.Anand'
>>         <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>; 'Malati
>>         Hegde' <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>         [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>         [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>         [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>         [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>         *Subject:* Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034
>>         <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
>>
>>         Lijo,
>>
>>         Thank you for the updated XML file. We have incorporated the
>>         updates and have made some edits, which include:
>>
>>           * Making "current time" lowercase to match the rest of the
>>             document.
>>           * Replacing Deadline Time and Origination Time with their
>>             acronyms DT and OT.
>>           * Placing the equation marked with (***) on its own line
>>             and creating hyperlinks to it.
>>           * Replacing the asterisks used to emphasize certain words
>>             with <em> elements. This italicizes the words in HTML and
>>             PDF, and uses underscores to highlight the words in TXT.
>>
>>         Please let us know if other changes are necessary:
>>
>>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-lastrfcdiff.html
>>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-lastrfcdiff.html>
>>         (changes in text)
>>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-xmllastrfcdiff.html
>>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-xmllastrfcdiff.html>
>>         (changes in the xml)
>>
>>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.txt
>>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.txt>
>>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.pdf
>>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.pdf>
>>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.html
>>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.html>
>>         https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.xml
>>         <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034.xml>
>>
>>         We also have the following questions:
>>
>>         1) The following sentence seems to be inconsistent in its
>>         terminology ("is required" versus "allow"):
>>
>>         Current:
>>            In order to allow fine-grained control over the setting of the
>>            deadline time, it is required to allow fractional seconds
>>         to be used
>>            in the fields for DT and OTD.
>>
>>         Perhaps:
>>            In order to provide fine-grained control over the setting
>>         of the
>>            deadline time, fractional seconds are REQUIRED to be used
>>            in the fields for DT and OTD.
>>
>>         Or perhaps:
>>            In order to allow fine-grained control over the setting of the
>>            deadline time, the fields for DT and OTD use fractional
>>         seconds.
>>
>>         2) May we replace "Orig_Node" (4 instances) with "originating
>>         node" to improve readability?
>>
>>         Best regards,
>>
>>         RFC Editor/jm
>>
>>         On 5/19/21 12:37 AM, Lijo Thomas wrote:
>>
>>             Dear Erik,
>>
>>             Thanks for pointing out that earlier discussion , which
>>             we have missed out in the process. It was a critical
>>             piece of work which needs to be in our draft.
>>
>>             Now in the current attached version (rfc9034-Final.xml),
>>             we have merged the changes as per the * below link, which
>>             includes the modular arithmetic fixes.*
>>
>>             https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MPf1zwq5KtY_tBspdH0JEW0yHPs/
>>             <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MPf1zwq5KtY_tBspdH0JEW0yHPs/>
>>
>>             Request you to consider this version, *as the final
>>             update from the authors*. Kindly review.
>>
>>             Please get back for further clarifications if any.
>>
>>             *@ Jean*– Treat this email as  an approval from my end.
>>             And many thanks for your kind understanding.
>>
>>             Thanks to all for your patience and support !!
>>
>>             *Thanks & Regards,*
>>
>>             *Lijo Thomas *
>>
>>             *From:*Erik Kline <[e-mail]>
>>             <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>             *Sent:* 18 May 2021 12:11
>>             *To:* Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]>
>>             <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>             *Cc:* Charlie Perkins <[e-mail]>
>>             <mailto:[e-mail]>; Lijo Thomas
>>             <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>; RFC Errata System
>>             <[e-mail]>
>>             <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>             [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>             S.V.R.Anand <[e-mail]>
>>             <mailto:[e-mail]>; Malati Hegde
>>             <[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>             [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>             [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>             [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
>>             [e-mail]
>>             <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>             *Subject:* Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034
>>             <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
>>
>>             Specifically, I'm wondering if we can give quick
>>             consideration to the topics here before final publication:
>>
>>             https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MPf1zwq5KtY_tBspdH0JEW0yHPs/
>>             <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MPf1zwq5KtY_tBspdH0JEW0yHPs/>
>>
>>             On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:04 PM Erik Kline
>>             <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Actually, can I put things on pause until inclusion
>>                 of some modular arithmetic fixes are merged (if they
>>                 haven't been already)?
>>
>>                 On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:01 PM Erik Kline
>>                 <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>>                     I've had a look over
>>                     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-diff.html
>>                     <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-diff.html>
>>                     and everything LGTM.
>>
>>                     Thanks,
>>
>>                     -ek
>>
>>
>>             150th Anniversary Mahatma Gandhi
>>
>>             ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>             [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
>>             Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA
>>             <https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA> & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
>>
>>             This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended
>>             recipient(s) and may
>>             contain confidential and privileged information. If you
>>             are not the
>>             intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
>>             e-mail and destroy
>>             all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized
>>             review, use,
>>             disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or
>>             copying of this email
>>             is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will
>>             be taken.
>>             ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         For assimilation and dissemination of knowledge, visit
>>         cakes.cdac.in
>>
>>         150th Anniversary Mahatma Gandhi
>>
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>         [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
>>         Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA
>>         <https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA> & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
>>
>>         This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
>>         and may
>>         contain confidential and privileged information. If you are
>>         not the
>>         intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail
>>         and destroy
>>         all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review,
>>         use,
>>         disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of
>>         this email
>>         is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be
>>         taken.
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>