Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-14.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Thu, 13 May 2021 22:57 UTC
Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8CDF407BB; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.01, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ihPFYKiMyPd; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE993F407BA; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247EE38988B; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NUXA5h5Mwq75; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AMSs-MBP.localdomain (unknown [47.186.1.92]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9060E38A055; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, ek.ietf@gmail.com, 6tisch-ads@ietf.org, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, c310@rfc-editor.org
References: <20210512190510.E4A78F407BC@rfc-editor.org> <15838.1620857752@localhost> <CAH7SZV_1XGV4YtrMLqiD5fJqP2ze_gmR5ZmSBuEKVQYzyHkiFQ@mail.gmail.com> <54abc1c7-f5df-3c3a-ab37-4da1a7f97e81@amsl.com> <CAH7SZV99xYt__3064TuuKj0Ti2bsW-srVvtujKiTFopu2tmAbA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
Message-ID: <2a3c1cc5-3dee-b67b-dbc8-d0074a7fa612@amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:57:49 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH7SZV99xYt__3064TuuKj0Ti2bsW-srVvtujKiTFopu2tmAbA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E7BA8B005881DCEF955CAC51"
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-14.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 22:57:50 -0000
Diego, Thank you for your response. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9032 We'll await word from Michael regarding other AUTH48 changes and/or approval. Best regards, RFC Editor/jm On 5/13/21 5:33 PM, Prof. Diego Dujovne wrote: > Jean, > I have read it, I did not catch any missing items, so I > approve the text as it is. > Regards, > > Diego Dujovne > > Le jeu. 13 mai 2021 à 18:21, Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com > <mailto:jmahoney@amsl.com>> a écrit : > > Diego, Michael, > > Thank you for your quick responses! We have updated the document > based on your feedback: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.txt > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.txt> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.pdf > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.pdf> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.html> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.xml > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032.xml> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032-diff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032-diff.html> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032-auth48diff.html > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032-auth48diff.html> > > We'll await further word from you regarding other AUTH48 changes > and/or approval. > > Best regards, > RFC Editor/jm > > On 5/12/21 6:54 PM, Prof. Diego Dujovne wrote: >> Dear all, >> I answer below. >> Regards, >> >> Diego >> >> Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 18:15, Michael Richardson >> <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr%2Bietf@sandelman.ca>> a écrit : >> >> >> I am reading: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032-rfcdiff.html >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9032-rfcdiff.html> >> (side-by-side) >> >> These are my comments, and I see that almost all of them >> should be taken with >> a grain of salt. I grew up in a bilingual Canadian province >> (EH!) with the >> highest Tim Horton's per-capita and nobody actually taught me >> English in school. >> (Mon Francais est aussi un poutine) >> >> >> Neither am I a native speaker, so I am glad to learn from your >> suggestions. >> >> >> You changed: >> Neighbor Discovery (ND) could even more scarce. >> to Neighbor Discovery (ND) could be even scarcer. >> >> >> My limited experience with many readers is that although >> "scarcer" is a word >> and means exactly what we need it to, that it isn't as well >> understood. >> >> >> Agreed. >> >> You changed: >> 1. Use of a multicast slot by even a non-malicious >> unauthenticated >> node for a Router Solicitation (RS) may overwhelm that >> time slot. >> >> 2. It may require many seconds of on-time before a new pledge >> receives a Router Advertisement (RA) that it can use. >> >> to: >> >> 1. Use of a multicast slot by even a non-malicious >> unauthenticated >> node for an RS may overwhelm that timeslot. >> 2. It may require many seconds of on-time before a new pledge >> receives an RA that it can use. >> >> I had explicitely expanded RS and RA a second time here, >> because I found that >> many Layer 2 knowledgeable reasons were not as familiar with >> these Layer 3 >> terms, but that saying it again helped them get it. >> I know that this goes against "define it the first time", but >> I felt that the >> Introduction needed to be more easily understood. >> >> >> I agree. I see that "an" is used because of the pronunciation of >> the acronyms RA and RS. >> >> >> You changed "an RPL" to "a RPL" in: >> is to serve as a RPL parent [RFC6550] within a particular >> network >> >> and this just sounds wrong to me. I dunno... >> >> >> In RFC 6550 it is used as "a RPL", because it is pronounced RPL >> as "ripl" I guess. >> >> >> I'm pretty happy with the entire document as you've edited so.. >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca >> <mailto:mcr%2BIETF@sandelman.ca>> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide >> >> >> >> -- >> DIEGO DUJOVNE >> Profesor Asociado >> Escuela de Informática y Telecomunicaciones >> Facultad de Ingeniería - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile >> www.ingenieria.udp.cl <http://www.ingenieria.udp.cl> >> (56 2) 676 8125 > > > > -- > DIEGO DUJOVNE > Profesor Asociado > Escuela de Informática y Telecomunicaciones > Facultad de Ingeniería - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile > www.ingenieria.udp.cl <http://www.ingenieria.udp.cl> > (56 2) 676 8125
- [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tisch-e… rfc-editor
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… rfc-editor
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9032 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney