Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com> Thu, 13 May 2021 18:20 UTC
Return-Path: <arusso@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C79F40773; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -198.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-198.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfAWds66qJxS; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0A1BF4076F; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F6E38A058; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KdySkcFysbSu; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.219] (c-71-227-153-114.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.227.153.114]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B0EC38A050; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Alice Russo <arusso@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210513181917.B37DEF4074D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:20:23 -0700
Cc: lijo@cdac.in, satishnaidu80@gmail.com, anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in, malati@ece.iisc.ernet.in, charliep@computer.org, 6lo-chairs@ietf.org, 6lo-ads@ietf.org, shwethab@cisco.com, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, c310@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9061BE1D-F44C-4640-8E14-D49F7440741C@amsl.com>
References: <20210513181917.B37DEF4074D@rfc-editor.org>
To: ek.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Subject: Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-05.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 18:20:24 -0000
Corrected URL below. > On May 13, 2021, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > 1) <!-- [rfced] AD: Please review and let us know if you approve the > changes made after -05 of this draft was approved. They are shown > in this diff file (comparing -05 and -06): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9034-postapproval-rfcdiff.html > > Note: -06 was provided by the author in October 2019; it is not in the Datatracker. > > For the purpose of AUTH48, the .original for this file is -05 > (the approved draft), so these changes are also viewable in the various > diff files provided. > --> Thank you. RFC Editor/ar
- [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf-6lo-dead… rfc-editor
- [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-ietf… rfc-editor
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Alice Russo
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Lijo Thomas
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Charlie Perkins
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Erik Kline
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Erik Kline
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… 'S.V.R.Anand'
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Malati Hegde
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… satish anamalamudi
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Erik Kline
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Lijo Thomas
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Lijo Thomas
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… lijo23@yahoo.com
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Erik Kline
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Erik Kline
- Re: [C310] [AD] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9034 <draft-… Jean Mahoney