Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 26 May 2021 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE58F407CD for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=0.01, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m4F36rhNzqA2 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22562F407CC for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id w12so30744126edx.1 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GssZnrDhnO5OHQnjOJCUqVQmoxksMMRdRpESGwBSDGU=; b=Kvp8UNfXE48NJS0SlOimuds8Ld0EY9t4OBlQy0q9pKGgzySXpfQAg0+qhTRCmQwh7O YhPnotVgtI72G/htxNzOrHVlHraaaDvUXpk3Q6CbHcNAMACahpn5SgjiMzL6VyjI7ATa Z0XSeM4xQVuo4E5TJN0iCoy1jiXPWUjTChxqGZ+YUjz6zTbm3OumW4Aw2xxbUoFJMydW veaplAP3/dpuf3Fe6Pgr4kmGW+v+3blhSVc4W36rTd/tZOFYvfdBmoIssG1ioY1F/a3z lSIBIcubmZ4szLPJ5+Pyvb/pDQ5Xg2jQoFQYjF3w8z3ntKWWoSw+/bvyoMTwrIDFZ+2c iaKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GssZnrDhnO5OHQnjOJCUqVQmoxksMMRdRpESGwBSDGU=; b=SfvpdawmcHd3WFLuaV0n7bvUu0FTu1bEzWh/MBxIet92VAuB5LOEKVfKwFgCpU4jJv rXKhtY3nRypxPAFUp0YbH/HlhqrkbokSQBJY7ta0Gzv/Wc3syTU21DcBtEg/3GQZaQ8/ izxeH4RQFyJl9NLp62oaAS1P3IozcoAchCi6BKrJAXMGhKzOdTZXsrF7wKSbNYAOOwW3 vZ/V+1zCaFqnEw1lX73Kvgdjk7EqagJKRaBHoTTqmVlqoZk3xBwA+P46RNvj1vD+qkdf VC1jSNOfQb9zdnz+WXZf2xmVQmzgsjCiq08J7P20y2zdWJfAfermeHDnov54+uMwXysm 4xOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kyU90380zCUi0MBH7qAFKK0Xvpt0edXM6U14TgCKBpiX7Xn99 waSKXvbyk5PeMvRTEXVlJt2RlYI1XvjtiETobMLX1Pl+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyt+t9SGk85MAoxO6jbTKd2hIxjNhiTxvTfK2y00pgjglIK/x+Ib/Hs3bbLhdPljWKk3Hv+XxG/PwQvS/auIxk=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd10:: with SMTP id i16mr34881600edv.274.1621992874651; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1196209@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-1188362@icann.org> <161237263486.16375.16046346962390939039@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-2459-1613104363-271.1188362-37-0@icann.org> <7357872F-30B2-47F5-BCF4-958913894591@amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-12070-1619736994-745.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-27769-1621353382-424.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <6E148B19-298A-4476-9A6F-8EE93B8F71DA@amsl.com> <6151fe4e-16ec-4585-b238-5bb3fcc5777a@www.fastmail.com> <3F942BA8-F4DB-4272-91BF-6013145818FE@amsl.com> <ef768958-63b8-4ea8-a61f-e579c461661a@www.fastmail.com> <7291f943-51de-456c-b8c6-a453c494725b@www.fastmail.com> <CAEE489E-9C98-4B60-AA45-30FB5DCE0F0B@amsl.com> <9074BE20-FD2A-4C36-99A6-F557F3DFABC6@amsl.com> <4cfba816-3cf8-4619-bf7c-ec8f555910b9@www.fastmail.com> <12AF4BBD-E681-4752-8AB8-53F65D349979@amsl.com> <CACpbDccjpjvdYSjVeVvWrCzP0EftUAy=QhTasA0Em9O30fKXBg@mail.gmail.com> <0C2956E1-E146-4655-8340-449CCAA45D0D@amsl.com> <70F34AC9-C14B-4A4E-9F11-22CC46CC4E32@amsl.com> <53beb18c-e6bb-4292-9dd7-2e1caa7901e0@www.fastmail.com> <AAE92C4B-E4DB-4B77-B6D9-94EEDA89ECBF@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <AAE92C4B-E4DB-4B77-B6D9-94EEDA89ECBF@amsl.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 18:34:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CACpbDccVDCZAcwm=sOV4WkWkAqGWe-LwoFrS-mUPZkLKDddJnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson via C430 <c430@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f335105c331a5b4"
Subject: Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)
X-BeenThere: c430@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c430.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c430/>
List-Post: <mailto:c430@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 01:34:29 -0000

Thanks for the catch, Lynne!

I agree with Martin, except for the last two corrections. There are
3 fields (ECT0 Count, ECT1 Count, ECN-CE Count), grouped together in the
text as the ECN counts. I don't think we should say ECN Counts field, since
that isn't actually a field... we can say "ECN counts" or "ECN counts
fields", but not "ECN Counts field".

>> 2.  In Section 19.3.2:  ... ECN Counts are only present ...
> >
> > Instead:
> > The ECN Counts field is only present ...
>

I propose changing this to "ECN counts are"

>> 3.  Just after Figure 27:  The three ECN Counts are: ...
> >
> > Instead:
> > The three fields in ECN Counts are: ...
>

I would propose here "The three ECN counts fields are: ..."
I'm fine with "The three ECN counts are: ..." as well, but I think "fields"
is appropriate here.

Martin -- WDYT?

- jana