Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)

[Lynne Bartholomew <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Martin and Jana.

We are preparing this document for publication.

Apologies, but one of our questions from earlier in the process fell through the cracks:

ECN count / ECN Count (in text, e.g., "3 ECN counts", "three ECN
   Counts")

This document has 22 instances of "ECN count", appearing between Section 7 and Appendix A.4.  There are three instances of "ECN Count" in text that we suggest changing to "ECN count":

1.  At the end of Section 19.3:  ... The three ECN Counts; ...

2.  In Section 19.3.2:  ... ECN Counts are only present ...

3.  Just after Figure 27:  The three ECN Counts are: ...

Please let us know if we may make these three updates.

Thank you!

RFC Editor/lb


> On May 20, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Lynne Bartholomew via C430 <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Jana.
> 
> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
> 
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9000
> 
> This document will be published along with the other documents in Cluster 430.  If you'd like to follow the progress of this cluster of documents, please see
> 
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C430
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> RFC Editor/lb
> 
>> On May 20, 2021, at 6:54 AM, Jana Iyengar <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Lynne,
>> 
>> I’ve gone through the change, and I approve the final document.
>> 
>> Thanks for your work!
>> - jana 
>> 
>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:25 PM Lynne Bartholomew via C430 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hi, Martin.  We've made the fix on our end and reposted the files.  (Even though it's a small update, we made a new iteration.)
>> 
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.txt
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.pdf
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.xml
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-diff.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-rfcdiff.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-auth48diff.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-lastdiff.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-lastrfcdiff.html
>> 
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-xmldiff1.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-xmldiff2.html
>> 
>> We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>> 
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9000
>> 
>> Thank you!
>> 
>> RFC Editor/lb
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 19, 2021, at 3:10 PM, Martin Thomson via C430 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Please fix this.  We're now at the point where I think you should hold the pen on changes (provided that they remain of this sort of size).
>>> 
>>> I'll make the same changes on our end so we keep up.
>>> 
>>> I've now reviewed all the changes and approve of the current document.  
>>> 
>>> (I understand that this is now mangled by preptool, which I don't like, but that's something I need to take up elsewhere.)
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 03:24, Lynne Bartholomew via C430 wrote:
>>>> Hi, Martin.
>>>> 
>>>> If you are currently updating this document, would you please change 
>>>> the non-ASCII quote before the "10" back to an ASCII quote?
>>>> 
>>>> 7509           <refcontent>Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM 
>>>> conference on Internet measurement - IMC ‘10</refcontent>
>>>> 
>>>> If you're not currently working on it, we will be happy to fix it and 
>>>> repost the files.
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> 
>>>> RFC Editor/lb
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 18, 2021, at 5:39 PM, Lynne Bartholomew via C430 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi, Martin.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We updated the RFC URLs in this document and also added the zero-width space to the CRYPTO_ERROR entry in Table 7.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The latest files are posted here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.txt
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.pdf
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.html
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000.xml
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-diff.html
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-rfcdiff.html
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-auth48diff.html
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-lastdiff.html
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-lastrfcdiff.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-xmldiff1.html
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9000-xmldiff2.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>> 
>>>>> RFC Editor/lb
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 18, 2021, at 5:16 PM, Martin Thomson via C430 <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> FWIW, I can put the change into source, but it runs into https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/548 (it isn't kramdown); so we won't be able to reproduce this on our end.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 10:12, Martin Thomson via C430 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 09:37, Lynne Bartholomew via C430 wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi, Martin.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Apologies for the oversight previously -- we think that in line with 
>>>>>>>> updates to Table 3 and the entry in Section 20.1 for CRYPTO_ERROR, the 
>>>>>>>> spaces around the "-" in the CRYPTO_ERROR row in Table 7 should be 
>>>>>>>> removed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yeah, I wanted to do that, but I didn't want to break the table and had 
>>>>>>> no means to do zero-width spaces (kramdown doesn't support that as far 
>>>>>>> as I'm aware).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you can add the zero-width space, that would be OK.  The output 
>>>>>>> looks fine.  (I'll try to wrestle the character into our source as 
>>>>>>> well.)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> <br/> seems like the wrong solution here.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> C430 mailing list
>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> C430 mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> C430 mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> C430 mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> C430 mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
>> 
>> -- 
>> C430 mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
> 
> -- 
> C430 mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430