IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C431] Status

Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> Mon, 24 January 2022 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: C431@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: C431@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EB110D61 for <C431@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QA5skIJMtnTq for <C431@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769D310D60 for <C431@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D39E425A344; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDTBWAM-qPGZ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:646:8b01:6dc0:d4b5:214:37df:7527] (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8b01:6dc0:d4b5:214:37df:7527]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 572DF424B435; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <332eef8d169e49be9fa439c03f8caa73@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:52:30 -0800
Cc: "C431@rfc-editor.org" <C431@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <116D2413-7382-4071-980E-0D0D7373C13C@amsl.com>
References: <332eef8d169e49be9fa439c03f8caa73@jhuapl.edu>
To: "Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Subject: Re: [C431] Status
X-BeenThere: c431@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: C431 <c431.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c431>, <mailto:c431-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c431/>
List-Post: <mailto:c431@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c431-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c431>, <mailto:c431-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:52:40 -0000

Hi, Ed.

RFCs 9171 and 9174 are ready to be published when RFCs-to-be 9172 and 9173 are also ready.

It appears that RFC 9173 is ready to go (<https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9173>, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C431>), but I can't confirm.

Thank you for your help in moving these documents forward!

RFC Editor/lb

> On Jan 23, 2022, at 8:45 PM, Birrane, Edward J. via C431 <c431@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Thank you all for the attention to these documents over the past week or two!
> 
> Editors,
> 
>  If I am reading things correctly, all documents are approved with the exception of RFC-to-be-9172 which is waiting on an IANA action.
> 
>  At this point, is there anything else we (authors/chairs/AD) need to do to help these documents complete the AUTH48 process?
> 
> -Ed
> 
> 
> ---
> Edward J. Birrane, III, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
> Chief Engineer, Space Constellation Networking
> Space Exploration Sector
> Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory
> (W) 443-778-7423 / (F) 443-228-3839
>   
> 
> -- 
> C431 mailing list
> C431@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c431
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email