Re: [C431] [EXT] Re: Status

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Thu, 27 January 2022 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: C431@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: C431@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D74119C8 for <C431@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:08:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRLqE9gL_xIw for <C431@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B265119C6 for <C431@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECC6425A344; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:08:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lN16myXPFppi; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [47.186.48.51]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61318424B435; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:08:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <80c4b85f-7637-3cce-e6b1-1289479a4f7f@amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:08:00 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>, "C431@rfc-editor.org" <C431@rfc-editor.org>
References: <332eef8d169e49be9fa439c03f8caa73@jhuapl.edu> <116D2413-7382-4071-980E-0D0D7373C13C@amsl.com> <19CFF23A-70A1-4E9F-AE27-C6C68982D136@amsl.com> <5ddd214f-c132-0ee3-4a0d-f126d2e96397@amsl.com> <00d3a86876d1479c9bd98eea78791f9a@jhuapl.edu>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <00d3a86876d1479c9bd98eea78791f9a@jhuapl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [C431] [EXT] Re: Status
X-BeenThere: c431@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: C431 <c431.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c431>, <mailto:c431-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c431/>
List-Post: <mailto:c431@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c431-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c431>, <mailto:c431-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:08:05 -0000

Hi Ed,

On 1/27/22 7:56 AM, Birrane, Edward J. wrote:
> Wonderful news! Thank you to all the editors for the time and expertise in these edits.
>
> I see all of the C431 documents are now in the AUTH48-DONE*R state.
>
> I am assuming the *R refers to the fact that these documents reference each other, and there isn't another external dependency that would delay their publication. Is that correct?

That's correct, and they are now moving along in the publication process.

Thank you!

RFC Editor/jm


>
> -Ed
>
> ---
> Edward J. Birrane, III, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
> Chief Engineer, Space Constellation Networking
> Space Exploration Sector
> Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory
> (W) 443-778-7423 / (F) 443-228-3839
>    
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: C431 <c431-bounces@rfc-editor.org> On Behalf Of Jean Mahoney via
>> C431
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 12:30 PM
>> To: Rebecca VanRheenen via C431 <c431@rfc-editor.org>
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [C431] Status
>>
>> APL external email warning: Verify sender c431-bounces@rfc-editor.org
>> before clicking links or attachments
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> RFC-to-be 9172 is also ready to be published.
>>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9172
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C431
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> RFC Editor/jm
>>
>> On 1/24/22 12:59 PM, Rebecca VanRheenen via C431 wrote:
>>> Lynne, Ed,
>>>
>>> I can confirm that RFC-to-be 9173 is also ready to be published.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> RFC Editor/rv
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jan 24, 2022, at 9:52 AM, Lynne Bartholomew via C431 <c431@rfc-
>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi, Ed.
>>>>
>>>> RFCs 9171 and 9174 are ready to be published when RFCs-to-be 9172 and
>> 9173 are also ready.
>>>> It appears that RFC 9173 is ready to go (<https://www.rfc-
>> editor.org/auth48/rfc9173>, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C431>),
>> but I can't confirm.
>>>> Thank you for your help in moving these documents forward!
>>>>
>>>> RFC Editor/lb
>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 23, 2022, at 8:45 PM, Birrane, Edward J. via C431 <c431@rfc-
>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you all for the attention to these documents over the past week
>> or two!
>>>>> Editors,
>>>>>
>>>>> If I am reading things correctly, all documents are approved with the
>> exception of RFC-to-be-9172 which is waiting on an IANA action.
>>>>> At this point, is there anything else we (authors/chairs/AD) need to do
>> to help these documents complete the AUTH48 process?
>>>>> -Ed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Edward J. Birrane, III, Ph.D. (he/him/his) Chief Engineer, Space
>>>>> Constellation Networking Space Exploration Sector Johns Hopkins
>>>>> Applied Physics Laboratory
>>>>> (W) 443-778-7423 / (F) 443-228-3839
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> C431 mailing list
>>>>> C431@rfc-editor.org
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c431
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> C431 mailing list
>>>> C431@rfc-editor.org
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c431
>>>>
>> --
>> C431 mailing list
>> C431@rfc-editor.org
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c431