Re: [Cacao] [EXT] Consensus call for CACAO Charter

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 25 June 2019 06:07 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cacao@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cacao@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A81120230 for <cacao@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DNb9g2KNvzuH for <cacao@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA1D120073 for <cacao@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p54A6CA4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.202.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45Xwg75mQzzyts; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:07:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9BD47F64-D893-4416-8013-02AE2527271B@symantec.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:07:30 +0200
Cc: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>, "cacao@ietf.org" <cacao@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 583135648.9735841-a19ee2ad8928ec8a6d30aecbdbc08530
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2705E843-FAF1-4512-9B9C-D91625A9A383@tzi.org>
References: <71E2F960-274F-4DA9-938A-E31AB0C474A4@cert.org> <9BD47F64-D893-4416-8013-02AE2527271B@symantec.com>
To: Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan=40symantec.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cacao/03TAUsQ3_uRO0q_ZlHqIqYIStU8>
Subject: Re: [Cacao] [EXT] Consensus call for CACAO Charter
X-BeenThere: cacao@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Collaborative Automated Course of Action Operations <cacao.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cacao>, <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cacao/>
List-Post: <mailto:cacao@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao>, <mailto:cacao-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 06:07:38 -0000

Well, you will need to make a change that is indicative of understanding the difference between a data serialization format (intended here: JSON) and a data modeling language (not decided, might be YANG, or tables written in English, or both).

How do you propose to fix this?

Grüße, Carsten


> On Jun 25, 2019, at 07:59, Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan=40symantec.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I do not agree with that proposed change.
> 
> Bret 
> 
> Sent from my Commodore 128D
> 
> PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
> 
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 4:21 PM, Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> wrote:
> 
>> We have a new charter revision posted to the list [1] and available as an internet-draft [2].  The charter addresses the comments made during the previous call and tightens the scope of the work.   Please send any comments on the charter to the list by June 28, 2019.  
>> 
>> At this point the chairs (and the AD’s) are concerned with the number of people willing to volunteer to edit documents.  There have been a number of people willing to review documents.  This lack of volunteering to edit documents is the biggest factor slowing the chartering of this effort as a working group currently.  If there are possible editors who have not participated in the IETF, please let them know to send an email to the list and volunteer.
>> 
>> Lastly,  with respect to the “JSON Data Model” concerns that have been voiced on the list from Med and Carsten, we propose the following from:
>> 
>> —
>> 
>> o  CACAO JSON Data Model
>> 
>>       *  Create a JSON data model that can capture and enable
>>          collaborative courses of action
>> 
>> 
>> to
>> 
>> o CACAO Data Model
>> * Create a data model that can capture and enable collaborative courses of action in 
>>   an appropriate format which can be realized in JSON and/or other wire formats as appropriate
>> 
>> —
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Joe and Chris
>> 
>> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cacao/k7XkqboXMJYkAmCBT99SJzQLTq8
>> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jordan-cacao-charter-06
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cacao mailing list
>> Cacao@ietf.org
>> https://clicktime.symantec.com/3XykSkxSzK393g6kotqED3o7Vc?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcacao
> -- 
> Cacao mailing list
> Cacao@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao