From nobody Wed Apr 19 05:45:27 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5F6C13AE44; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:45:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.094 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b="ilucQIQg"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="C4EPtV4s" Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-NsMqZzkW_W; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71BBCC13AE3B; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2271F5C0158; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:45:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:45:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1681908317; x=1681994717; bh=BiXvkl0MhMo1/WcyexVgttf5Am3hNkFBqQc mbUBn90A=; b=ilucQIQggBECC/zDee6TwFr5YdavJ7uX8EgfZw17Vv/J19cCmbL 9uxQMzyG/roCX34Y0iUF7EciymO5gKunOLUhM3+CFB9iKBLzQ6kFIXF1SmD6FZYr 1AyrCh3+D7MHtgGwMSWjj9eOe4DeAC2V10RyXGfjrLZkLCS9fm81+KA+iWmBrHqU 8TaoqbogD1qFIrQ/5ptNE73s2KvQvknXLyfooj2uGufSFlIhSv0KuTbH4hXXemlB iJSbSLi+lZDpU24xaPPtOWhCHsVQIG3jxlF5ArzwxlIPDzVbeFU0NrpfmTFa/1A3 BgeJN/iDDLdWCQ3w0FzYz7+AOrrF/37ZWHw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1681908317; x=1681994717; bh=BiXvkl0MhMo1/ WcyexVgttf5Am3hNkFBqQcmbUBn90A=; b=C4EPtV4sURskyArYuyQ+oYWNUDH7B r35qvUaveKdNk6cI31bdTzRuGPvVbvqZIKIOnWZwQKs8vYONIT+Jw6Ihn9Ili6ke eeJSRb2YsNJU4D2Eud2ey+m8Svi32/t8f3XqmAph/DTKte+bY4BF8NJE6HIUXW/E st6nP0c+ILnsBlPTbsik2K26rXYN+USydj6HeHw1FEk4aD23267Ok9CmC7MC4uQQ DYyuTEhJ+5EpTlNiTxGWiraM8CR6+GE6M1EG03yeQ/WjHsRbBUF0IGOBTOwTVYtm eVRgf5qse6sgkCWNTLyFFCw04ZREOiqRVB7q6zhMeeLbDGLIp6njGl6Sw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfedttddgheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsegrtderreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftfho sggvrhhtucfuthgvphgrnhgvkhdfuceorhhsthhosehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfffleevhfehjeehudeuhfeivddugfffheevgeev ffekhfffhfeftdegheeutdeunecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpthifihhtth gvrhdrtghomhdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdgtnhhrrdhithenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehrshhtohesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlth gvrghmrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia5d944da:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D5DDD2D40074; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:45:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-374-g72c94f7a42-fm-20230417.001-g72c94f7a Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <9924e903-16c5-4365-9212-978319a247ef@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <168129934700.22358.17386302551332411699@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <168129934700.22358.17386302551332411699@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:44:55 +0200 From: "Robert Stepanek" To: "Lars Eggert" , "The IESG" Cc: draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard@ietf.org, calext-chairs@ietf.org, calsify@ietf.org, "Daniel Migault" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e52bf99a58b743c2bbdc12c8e116e5fc Archived-At: Subject: Re: [calsify] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard-07: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:45:25 -0000 --e52bf99a58b743c2bbdc12c8e116e5fc Content-Type: text/plain Thanks, we updated the document accordingly. Details below. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 1:35 PM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote: > Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard-07 > > CC @larseggert > > Thanks to Russ Housley for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/8_hl1kpXskr0y8aUmQzzSG8W5sE). > > ## Discuss > > ### Missing "Updates" explanation > > This document updates RFC6350, but does not seem to include explanatory text > about this in the abstract. Done > > ## Comments > > ### Section 2.8.6, paragraph 4 > ``` > SOCIALPROFILE;SERVICE-TYPE=Twitter:https://twitter.com/ietf > > "onlineServices": { > ... > "OS-1": { > "@type": "OnlineService", > "service": "Twitter", > "user": "https://twitter.com/ietf", > "kind": "uri" > } > } > ``` > Might be better to use an example domain here? Done. > > ### Uncited references > > Document updates `RFC6350`, but does not cite it as a reference, which is a bit > odd. done > > ## Nits > > All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to > address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by > automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there > will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you > did with these suggestions. > > ### Outdated references > > Document references `draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-08`, but `-09` is the latest > available revision. This may be an artifact due to the order in which we published the RFC drafts. > > ### URLs > > These URLs in the document can probably be converted to HTTPS: > > * http://www.iit.cnr.it done > > ### Grammar/style We fixed all. --e52bf99a58b743c2bbdc12c8e116e5fc Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, we= updated the document accordingly. Details below.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 1:35 PM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote:<= br>
Lars Eggert= has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-= calext-jscontact-vcard-07: No Objection

Whe= n responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to = cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
<= br>



COMMENT:
-----------------------------------= -----------------------------------

# GEN A= D review of draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-vcard-07

CC @larseggert

Thanks to Russ Housley= for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review

## Discuss
### Missing "Updates" explanation

<= div>This document updates RFC6350, but does not seem to include explanat= ory text
about this in the abstract.

Done


## Comments
<= br>
### Section 2.8.6, paragraph 4
```
=
     SOCIALPROFILE;SERVICE-TYPE=3DTwitter:https://twitter.com/ietf

     "onlineServices": {
=
       ...
  =      "OS-1": {
    = ;     "@type": "OnlineService",
 =         "service": "Twitter",
         "user": "https://twitter.com/ietf",
         "kind": "uri"
       }
  = ;   }
```
Might be better to use a= n example domain here?

Done.


### Uncited references

Do= cument updates `RFC6350`, but does not cite it as a reference, which is = a bit
odd.

done<= br>

<= div>
## Nits

All comments bel= ow are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagge= d by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-review= tool), so there
will likely be some false positives. T= here is no need to let me know what you
did with these sug= gestions.

### Outdated references
=

Document references `draft-ietf-calext-jscontact-08`= , but `-09` is the latest
available revision.

This may be an artifact due to the order i= n which we published the RFC drafts.


### URLs

These URLs in the document can probably be convert= ed to HTTPS:


done


### Grammar/style
<= div>
We fixed all.

--e52bf99a58b743c2bbdc12c8e116e5fc--