Re: [calsify] New Timestamp Draft

[Ujjwal Sharma <[e-mail]>]

Hi Steve!

Sorry for taking a while before responding to your emails.

Talking specifically about your concerns:

> This document needs to define the meaning of time using a term other
> than UTC for any date prior to 1960.


and

> Also note that cesium hyperfine frequency ... cesium second

> was not adopted by the SI until 1967 August.

For both of these, I like have to point out that none of these
definitions were added in this update and belong to the original RFC
(RFC 3339). That said, if folks agree that the original RFC incorrectly
defines these terms and they need to be updated, I'd be happy to correct
them in the next revision of the draft.

That said, I would have to point out that my knowledge in this space is
rather limited and therefore it would be best if you recommended exactly
what the replacement should be. To take things further, you could also
make a pull request to the project at
https://github.com/ryzokuken/draft-ryzokuken-datetime-extended
or email me a git patch if you prefer that.

Thanks,
Ujjwal

-- 
Ujjwal "Ryzokuken" Sharma (he/him)

Compilers Hacker, Node.js Core Collaborator and Speaker