IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com> Tue, 08 October 2019 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B1A12085D; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mvaHTd8N7Lxr; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0D612004E; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id u40so25213676qth.11; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=VPEe3z4F68YZrsS34dOaJ6q84i8tJDbGPK1B8dGrQn4=; b=g3W21qIvFxmnThe6WS102lLnCQooeA+BBsLrIlUm/u8toq3GGx1dzXgexl5Qr64Wjn yzGaEwxcAznCE/e2jipZKCB8bNlH+TNdzt5pB3XJICjbJFSgLda9/1jygyWdfLxU+vU7 67B3/yUnBnlRaEHWAKM9WqMgY8tqzr7wZ0Sw/gEK1L0CW7C7DgtN7TkacqRHxHCo79vj GlXRzNfNpeO8rc2m3IAgGEedIsOy9m4HThMsyQo1mHzhvxp9BQfVnMPeIHrYhm6iLPbV TL9L7nfS9v7yeKGCf8ox7CJW9xstE7mRlEb420QcA0wl1zjUUb7LlNKSVjynduSjay6W GzAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=VPEe3z4F68YZrsS34dOaJ6q84i8tJDbGPK1B8dGrQn4=; b=HvbBvZOUuKfMEEy2tSyLyKrlVcG6t/YFa/rfLHTN10qYMORAUDYRfRZK9/r2SfblMP SjFbux0mypFB9Soz1iGWI46vVCrDMQL3zTvvdbG5kAWLAx+asvZFoquvt34uZH/lNST2 vGk/G9ikEZQcuwzAJxa3oSBPQPg2vHVlw7gcFDVHW5+DI/yXuYFZMu1icYsICDI5NBQM s5jQ2eaziRPWfEQ7v8/jBueEKcoLbdKNN6SEanFhST36PMiYS7yPXoQsukLJUrR9ffSY NczRdWslpnRXtkIl6YLl3ZsDt0bO/0V9nDv8VNQRC22WEgQVnang9623R4c5x3RqlYNO imqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPgcckgULRlWAZkVCY12WGma4/cCw1UU+5fXhAC4oeabw7TPAo DB/6ZNQ2/wWzpbM3mPBwXrJfGf9EQis=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAq8Ol4rGySrWT2UCCN+/SOHG1MpQcl6dxUO9WP9pl8zAvYTXO2TcHvb76VEzMrX0wlAqkgw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:582:: with SMTP id bx2mr20253580qvb.60.1570541027084; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 06:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Michaels-MacBook-Pro.local (pool-100-19-39-104.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [100.19.39.104]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q200sm8740499qke.114.2019.10.08.06.23.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 06:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions@ietf.org, calext-chairs@ietf.org, calsify@ietf.org
References: <155916352061.5560.17495616222314318364.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5c3dc619-1d8f-32df-dd86-1aeb11f61d97@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:23:45 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <155916352061.5560.17495616222314318364.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/7I9PvPAP_EE4IHmq0ZsGP500R1Y>
Subject: Re: [calsify] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:24:00 -0000

On 5/29/19 16:58, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions-13: Discuss
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-eventpub-extensions/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Section 7.6:
>
> " The format type and schema parameters can be specified on this
>        property and are RECOMMENDED for text or inline binary encoded
>        content information."
>
> Doesn't this need to be REQUIRED rather than RECOMMENDED in order for it to
> improve rather than potentially worsen interoperability?
Agreed
>
> Section 8.1:
>
> "User agents MUST NOT include this information
>        without informing the participant."
>
> This seems like it needs to say "without the participant's express permission."
> (As in https://www.w3.org/TR/geolocation-API).
Agreed
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please respond to the Gen-ART review.
>
> The abstract should mention the update to RFC 7986 and the introduction should
> explain what is updated.
With removal of updates to SOURCE this draft no longer updates 7986 so 
I've removed that.
>
> Section 11:
>
> "This specification does not
>     introduce any additional privacy concerns beyond those described in
>     [RFC5545]."
>
> This seems untrue given the sentence that follows it, so this should be deleted.
Agreed


I'll submit a further draft soon

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> calsify mailing list
> calsify@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email