Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property
Joris Baum <joris@audriga.com> Mon, 03 January 2022 15:47 UTC
Return-Path: <joris@audriga.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E153A00E9;
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 07:47:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.973, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id pnU8vk2BiTMm; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 07:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.audriga.com (mail.audriga.com [176.221.42.35])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EC23A00E3;
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 07:47:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.audriga.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710B5A0B6;
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 16:47:01 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.audriga.com
Received: from mail.audriga.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.audriga.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id CzDwnPEs6oei; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 16:46:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.94]
(HSI-KBW-46-223-162-197.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [46.223.162.197])
(Authenticated sender: joris@audriga.com)
by mail.audriga.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21231A06A;
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 16:46:30 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------x93mL27bFHckL07yYYdOh0ZY"
Message-ID: <9ab3530b-2e85-806b-bcf8-0cf5a11781a4@audriga.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 16:46:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.4.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: calsify@ietf.org, IETF JMAP Mailing List <jmap@ietf.org>
References: <d78004af-bd2e-4d26-a5fc-174d2e5da0e3@www.fastmail.com>
<e1df5f67-aa50-54c1-c3b1-68cb4ea09b7b@fastmail.com>
<bc8705b4-fa07-4c2f-94f0-a1a6ea295d5f@dogfood.fastmail.com>
From: Joris Baum <joris@audriga.com>
In-Reply-To: <bc8705b4-fa07-4c2f-94f0-a1a6ea295d5f@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/7rCGkwDik1ZE0BpwRkdpNRqm5Vg>
Subject: Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>,
<mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>,
<mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 15:47:09 -0000
Hi Robert and happy new year everyone :) , I also like the proposal and would also vote for keeping it simple and not introduce things like variable substitution. For our use case it is not necessary to add a biological sex component to JSCalendar. Having grammaticalGender definitely improves mapping from vCard to JSCalendar. As the topic of gender is apparently quite complex and also dynamic, maybe it would be a good idea to point to the Vendor-Specific Property Extension definition in the gender property section again? This way we could encourage developers to come up with their own extensions. Regards, Joris On 23.12.21 20:55, Neil Jenkins wrote: > Thanks Robert, I think this is a good, well-reasoned proposal. > > On Fri, 24 Dec 2021, at 12:48 AM, Ken Murchison wrote: >> I also wonder if we might want to add a property for a user's >> preferred pronouns. > > Is that not covered by grammaticalGender? > > On Fri, 24 Dec 2021, at 1:51 AM, Andreas Hauser wrote: >> Not only is there grammaticalGender but also salutations often differ >> based on relationship, like "Dear Robert" / "Dear Sir“ or „Lieber >> Robert“ / „Sehr geehrter Herr Stepanek“. > > That feels out-of-scope to me, especially if you have to start > introducing variable substitution. > > —Neil > > _______________________________________________ > calsify mailing list > calsify@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify -- Joris Baum Tel: +49 721 170293 16 Fax: +49 721 170293 179 http://www.audriga.com |http://www.twitter.com/audriga -------------------------------------------------------------------------- audriga GmbH | Durlacher Allee 47 | 76131 Karlsruhe Sitz der Gesellschaft: Karlsruhe - Amtsgericht Mannheim - HRB 713034 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Frank Dengler, Dr.-Ing. Hans-Jörg Happel --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- [calsify] JSContact: gender property Robert Stepanek
- Re: [calsify] JSContact: gender property Ken Murchison
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Neil Jenkins
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Andreas Hauser
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Joris Baum
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Robert Stepanek
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Neil Jenkins
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Robert Stepanek
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Robert Stepanek
- Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property Robert Stepanek