Re: [calsify] I-D Action: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04.txt

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Wed, 11 February 2015 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADF91A1A13 for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:25:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fp-tcwrA4QQz for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:25:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60EA1A1A3E for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13739B8689A for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:25:39 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eMmYetbR_2nu for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:25:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [17.45.162.196] (unknown [17.45.162.196]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F428B8688F for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:25:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:25:35 -0500
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: calsify@ietf.org
Message-ID: <C2BA7FD63CC725DD78A6CB80@cyrus.local>
In-Reply-To: <20150211172407.16984.17769.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150211172407.16984.17769.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0b1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="190"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/GAKn0n6GiIyKZLpH81yxztDxeMc>
Subject: Re: [calsify] I-D Action: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04.txt
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:25:58 -0000

Hi folks,
I have just posted a new version of the RSCALE draft that addresses the AD 
and OPSDIR reviews (with suggested corrections as previously discussed on 
the list).


-- 
Cyrus Daboo