Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property

Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com> Fri, 07 January 2022 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1123A1682 for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:10:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=U0D1jW86; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=FAbRH0fI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N2-8J6aHySDy for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4163A1681 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201A53202F40 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 03:10:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 07 Jan 2022 03:10:42 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=EbB2w0U U/a6/8ePPYGSxnohoWq73A+4aez3ODuEgIYA=; b=U0D1jW862cuYFkwwwFqIBc/ TGg86CoExtvRPur3nKLYy5a80wOhieKovJzXQ+IOHNNrDp7FYWkjKekH0iz/93+S QnJeU/6quhJnweVXmZXzretOfBAexuooXa/Gl+MkzKrtZVHOfbz7/60nE2Ib2fes XyejNxDvgXZUH57W3oJ6DZAbJsH9X+9put4yU4w9d5GwLYagQxRioQUlNj+tS/YL MjlceT8dCj/rExqhflJgx6bzQ+ur8q4wlSI8rPoj30vmcB41qZT4BtqkiGIT4KC2 QI3fRX5xT9L2z6skFCFRU130RKukNuNSY2GbXWn0rvuqkMwrTwVSbS934xpeHlw= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=EbB2w0 UU/a6/8ePPYGSxnohoWq73A+4aez3ODuEgIYA=; b=FAbRH0fIVpgll0BIQef3Bq SpnzW2SQ6bpoYO3CsmBQTTqCo8yP5BxqnueIshfSEvtAeRyqdZzEST98zrQPhlE0 vOjI5a2UqkQfSqz64MUMeIyzVUaL2qfthJ+lumsipJQAw84K5aUV5QE7BP2ePRvh N7Vx9sRDd84v7o+iiMQ9H2+LDIuF7xqzxKhOOhF8kMyiOlyCAlKfjpSwktAuuogW m34wonvdIA6VPPrVnCk9XvvkkIHdRuzxuVyAnH/gmP02hxqD6hnQu+zUJ9xiiuOs iy84LpeQ41Ks2XHYxdpWIR4y35zZKrHE0S08vR0np4b9WLnwncbxYpvgsikI0TSw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:gfXXYb2TO0AGMg6mU7IHNPjlFMcFIm2cXOerDt6Zq-YtbmWO7JFngw> <xme:gfXXYaHRS0BnEJydX6oDf8iVWUmFKRScIU8zTeu4ZCo0tju597PwZS2OHs6NdCAXZ 1gsbMF_QtAn2Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudegtddgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrg dtreerreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdftohgsvghrthcuufhtvghprghnvghkfdcuoehrshht ohesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehgeeuvd dtkefhtefgueefgfdvueetgeeffeelhedvudegjeejhfetuefgveevieenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehrshhtohesfhgrshhtmh grihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:gfXXYb4_a1RstduzFYjYcH2OxOqGyqR4z8bNQ9mzbK9-F3Nc57C1RA> <xmx:gfXXYQ1E-hhZFnUTXpQNt_GviFji0h-jAfWG8eJe0ajJgaIVAsS_0g> <xmx:gfXXYeFr8rkMSzsG_9WQMTXSNTcs3zVV3pXINO-yn5CHkmJJOviPSw> <xmx:gfXXYSTZEZKGOihvA3nyF6n2TRO49F0IZh2-scvVC8fRHuBn_4MWdw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3D36EAC0E9C; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 03:10:41 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-4526-gbc24f4957e-fm-20220105.001-gbc24f495
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <ea3da12a-5c79-44fc-9f9c-facab32bafb6@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1e90f8b2-2d51-4034-8a77-a2dc5c6b31f3@localhost:3000>
References: <d78004af-bd2e-4d26-a5fc-174d2e5da0e3@www.fastmail.com> <E971A616-867E-4F2F-8BD2-31CEEB70D260@LMU.de> <fbeabe73-91cd-4fd8-b932-f80c1373b6cd@www.fastmail.com> <1e90f8b2-2d51-4034-8a77-a2dc5c6b31f3@localhost:3000>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 09:10:20 +0100
From: "Robert Stepanek" <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
To: calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=9865282ee3bc4714b3fdca9337a83097
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/JEvgRUOez8bnXsL4TO-6ACW2x98>
Subject: Re: [calsify] [Jmap] JSContact: gender property
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 08:10:51 -0000

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022, at 5:04 AM, Neil Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2022, at 3:20 AM, Robert Stepanek wrote:
>> What we might consider instead is to allow setting modifiers on the grammatical gender:
> Yeah, I'm wary of adding something here without a full understanding of how it would actually be used

I agree. As a German speaker I can see some use for "number" and "formality", but it seems application developers did just fine without them in VCARD. Also, the risk is high that it would just introduce a bias for both English and German and still not being adequate for other languages.

>> the Google People API has the addressMe field in the Person.gender property. It is a free-text field and the examples suggest to store the pronouns in the form "they/them".
> I think a free text field for this makes sense.

Agreed.

The next RFC draft will reflect these decisions. Thanks to all of you for your input.