IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] New Timestamp Draft

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 14 January 2021 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD193A0CF1 for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:33:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=IJNpKLB1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GaDibc6b
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wb7L1elp83fy for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:33:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0E5A3A0CEF for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:33:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8CA5C0154 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 20:33:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 20:33:24 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=yndIDec /9fRab7Wkp0pHZECxoflz4g8s87szWM9EL/s=; b=IJNpKLB1U2QKeOOE3ftfk4d CbwwGmPzYi6M5wfL4pDTjEWDS5fdrW7btCvpfW9vr1NJAPoHJzoV6Kx29PA+itAU sW74P2wH58DmbP4GHIBljHM9mhTl23OomqTtOhmSTgXKNzdoEh69EJSgEFQtZO7I zIAcIf100SaRcMjDYTla/bC9Nc+vIjL0ksTzrcm2Igx2qJTipb3+OYRYUvKBeurr lskoQbEF7pc50VS5v5jGe++yHber5I2+bpHHFvH+KPyesSZb5UMb5XkxLbSKSlgN lNYJiQH8HTHb1BLmE0e2I0KRuoYCacX8SseuI2SyuthZm+tQlAraQ41Jw9ztpOg= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=yndIDe c/9fRab7Wkp0pHZECxoflz4g8s87szWM9EL/s=; b=GaDibc6b30LvZ9Xn1Nl7PB IbKBMFRShVmAQjP2dWKWwZ2Vg5GmYqTXXGr3E5fxRCYGt7u28Dg3oGw5FCWhDZ29 fXt8vOfhs4umtWv+tY+MvpQWrVc7fWqwE9BKHL0zCneoEc/dw+Vra3R3EsLCeJXn Xu9zj7XBGdSWtH4l1zL4wbOa8HUR/QGF0jFKBbdLCMfuIM4lk1UbRLAr6NfDJU84 wosOtph8D+Nkr9mKfqsSPkWlpth9lroqlow+lb8oUvRTGLax9VBUYUXOs1QTlYYi JjR6YjzG+jeamNxaCdOiNEDKPXG4jPR2UvK40ejNMxezWQ5m4x7VAQ1EpGP5kTiA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Y5__XzVCjejRpHFIGNoVkdNxMTur603PHenIEX9ZJMURBASrqwelXQ> <xme:Y5__X7nqcjQpC_FtpdXwpFr7NjyCgZgwOGWvBzG4QD3gU6A0NPPyfjD6ZNh8F7Lj1 aG3PE7lxpk>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedukedrtdeggdefhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtre erreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhhonhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehf rghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfduvefgffdvve ethfeiteehteduhfeltddujeehffektdevleeileeiheevkeegnecuffhomhgrihhnpehi vghtfhdrohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgt ohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Y5__X_Z-vFuYtd6oWYvRsBLHWt98dNEFmj-8Sh4omorFiD_hGzpDWg> <xmx:Y5__X-V-_gywA36O2NgrT3uchcxpFE37h4-eXEBXrvs0rjAwb5enHA> <xmx:Y5__X9mJvfvKoo6kwzMT68AD-f8BiTdfBY_ocVlMFQWCSoqjqmgmrg> <xmx:ZJ__X5zeTb8k1VSs-YJ2J_JYdeGfDLKCoajQPw0YXMLCe8jCyX7p2w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9E94B180093; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 20:33:23 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-45-g4839256-fm-20210104.001-g48392560
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <da1b1dce-c4ce-49f2-b802-2bcbe00445c4@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a78e1a49-de7b-d2ed-c112-0bbd0cb62399@igalia.com>
References: <36725ce1-307a-945e-63bf-af98f4b85338@igalia.com> <a78e1a49-de7b-d2ed-c112-0bbd0cb62399@igalia.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:33:03 +1100
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="c3bb48530bd443f5959972aa5b19b5ca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/MouMwT5zLRh0yebun_y7VCTP_j4>
Subject: Re: [calsify] New Timestamp Draft
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 01:33:28 -0000

I can do a call for adoption straight away if you like - the next meeting isn't for a couple of months.

Bron.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 05:24, Ujjwal Sharma wrote:
> One question: given things move forward smoothly, how do I proceed?
> Should I apply for this document to be adopted by the calext WG? I
> suppose the fastest way to proceed is to present it at the next IETF
> meeting?
> 
> 
> 
> Ujjwal
> 
> On 12/01/2021 4.03 am, Ujjwal Sharma wrote:
> > Hi Calsify folks!
> > 
> > I am sorry for the long delay, I got a little sidetracked working on
> > other things, but I'm happy to inform you all that I have something that
> > resembles a first draft for the updated timestamps RFC.
> > 
> > Here's where you can find it:
> > 
> > Datatracker:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryzokuken-datetime-extended/
> > GitHub: https://github.com/ryzokuken/draft-ryzokuken-datetime-extended
> > 
> > I would request you all to take a look at it when you can and let me
> > know what you think. You can file a GitHub issue or email me directly.
> > 
> > There's a few open discussions regarding the exact format and how the
> > interaction with bodies like the Unicode consortium work, so please feel
> > free to send me your thoughts regarding that as well.
> > 
> > Also, some references/bibliography is not perfectly functional yet
> > because I am still relatively new to authoring RFCs using Metanorma but
> > I'm actively looking into it.
> > 
> > Thanks and looking forward to hear from you,
> > Ujjwal
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Ujjwal "Ryzokuken" Sharma (he/him)
> 
> Compilers Hacker, Node.js Core Collaborator and Speaker
> 
> _______________________________________________
> calsify mailing list
> calsify@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify
> 

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email