[calsify] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-05: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 25 February 2021 07:00 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietf.org
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991243A145D;
Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:00:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions@ietf.org, calext-chairs@ietf.org,
calsify@ietf.org, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>,
Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.26.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161423640259.18976.6018954114099831363@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:00:02 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/WnyAltrObMao4dRM1JAeI2V_1js>
Subject: [calsify] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on
draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>,
<mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>,
<mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:00:03 -0000
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This document appears to enable (or continue) support for the notion of extension properties prefixed by "X-" (via the "x-prop" ABNF token). That seems contrary to BCP 178. I realize this is just continuing in what was done in RFC 5545, but should it be dropped her? Other than this one concern, this is really well written. Nice work.
- [calsify] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draf… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [calsify] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on … Barry Leiba
- Re: [calsify] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on … Murray S. Kucherawy