Re: [calsify] Review of draft-ietf-calext-ical-relations-00

[Philipp Kewisch <[e-mail]>]

On 2/3/17 7:57 PM, Michael Douglass wrote:
>>> - Sec 10.2: I don't think STRUCTURED-CATEGORY belongs.  Its not a
>>> parameter.
>> I do not feel that STRUCTURED-CATEGORY can be considered a "relation",
>> which this draft is about. Maybe it makes sense to move this to a
>> different document?
>
> STRUCTURED-CATEGORY is the target of relationships. During our work on
> tasks we felt there was a need for explicitly stating the relationship
> that grouped tasks or events.
>
> This type of relationship is also heavily used in public events - we
> use that type of relationship to create virtual collections and would
> like to see the approach formalised so that it can be exported.
>
> So I agree STRUCTURED-CATEGORY itself is not a relationship but it
> allows for the creation of relationships with a reltype.
Ok, so if I understand correctly specifying RELTYPE=STRUCTURED-CATEGORY
on a link or relation means that the item is related to all items that
have a certain structured category? Do you think you could elaborate on
this a bit more in Section 1.3, and maybe add a one-sentence info in
section 7.1 that explains it can be used in combination with
RELTYPE=STRUCTURED-CATEGORY ?

In case I haven't mentioned, it looks like the intro in section 1
mentions three points while there are four subsections, and the order is
swapped.

Philipp