Re: [calsify] New Timestamp Draft

Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> Mon, 11 January 2021 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <sla@ucolick.org>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4223A141A for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HD0Gzj4RScmv for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (unknown [128.114.23.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5485A3A141B for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DDF2A8F for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (geneva.ucolick.org [128.114.23.183]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6A22744 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geneva.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2286BE for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sla@localhost) by geneva.ucolick.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 10BMhFB7020642 for calsify@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:15 -0800
Resent-From: Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:43:15 -0800
Resent-Message-ID: <20210111224315.GA20639@ucolick.org>
Resent-To: "calsify@ietf.org" <calsify@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sla@ucolick.org
Delivered-To: sla@ucolick.org
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (hunan.ucolick.org [128.114.23.233]) by delivery.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D36E1DEB5 for <sla@ucolick.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022142781; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (geneva.ucolick.org [128.114.23.183]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37932732; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geneva.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2FC6BE; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:42:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sla@localhost) by geneva.ucolick.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 10BMggE8020626; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:42:42 -0800
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:42:42 -0800
From: Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org>
To: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@igalia.com>
Message-ID: <20210111224242.GA20167@ucolick.org>
References: <36725ce1-307a-945e-63bf-af98f4b85338@igalia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <36725ce1-307a-945e-63bf-af98f4b85338@igalia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted
X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Jan 11 14:42:44 2021
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 191,5ffcd46412617673529933
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, hath+writ, 0.00010, WGS+84, 0.00010, Received*(from+sla, 0.00010, Allen+<sla, 0.00010, 84+(GPS), 0.00010, UCO/Lick, 0.00010, User-Agent*12, 0.00010, 165+Lat, 0.00010, Lng, 0.00010, Received*geneva.ucolick.org, 0.00010, Received*geneva.ucolick.org, 0.00010, 831+459, 0.00010, Cruz+CA, 0.00010, Room+165, 0.00010, 99855, 0.00010, Received*(from, 0.00010, Url*org/~sla/, 0.00010, 36+99855, 0.00010, From*Allen+<sla, 0.00010, Received*by+geneva.ucolick.org, 0.00010, Received*by+geneva.ucolick.org, 0.00010, User-Agent*12+15), 0.00010, ISB+260, 0.00010, User-Agent*15), 0.00010, 459+3046, 0.00010, Natural+Sciences, 0.00010, (GPS)+UCO/Lick, 0.00010
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/jlgI3Sa2xM7e_8vmincAJUgghPk>
Subject: Re: [calsify] New Timestamp Draft
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:43:18 -0000

On Tue 2021-01-12T04:03:26+0530 Ujjwal Sharma hath writ:
> Datatracker:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryzokuken-datetime-extended/
> GitHub: https://github.com/ryzokuken/draft-ryzokuken-datetime-extended

The term "UTC" was not in use and has no defined meaning prior to 1960.
No radio broadcast time signals were coordinated until April of 1960.
Before 1960 there can only be UT; there cannot be UTC.

This document needs to define the meaning of time using a term other
than UTC for any date prior to 1960.

--
Steve Allen                    <sla@ucolick.org>              WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260  Natural Sciences II, Room 165  Lat  +36.99855
1156 High Street               Voice: +1 831 459 3046         Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064           https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/  Hgt +250 m