Re: [calsify] SECOND Last Call: <draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-32.txt> (JSCalendar: A JSON representation of calendar data) to Proposed Standard

Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 20 May 2021 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA943A278E for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=DrrBA2bu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ntDo5Dpk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35VPn8A-A1Al for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29D9F3A278D for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A13B1D99 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 19 May 2021 21:19:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=eIAyqil YHgkkzrjFvlhBcFnClmY+TLSDxGEw3X23aXc=; b=DrrBA2buI+UsltnIBBA8Ia7 H6tfLEcavRqoyws0TUte8O85f520FWroGkAfJe0sAEmJt77+rTpLqQAHONh/vtdp DqKLD0UpOyWZafLedhSLQVmqGMemnqHovdBlCRuRK8M9iaxELpV5R6g5lg9fn7lh tpnvjHG8OJCfYaR3zfi6DC2sPr08wf0QmuUOf8M1IgspxmqkiEYm5crQIAg7ULCI Fj8zOveq5txpHQjSpQeFRvh/UUFoKyTHS+BFDK5zGYd9UG7rNLVdapYnhmqcer5S DG8SY0IrOp0KXPfpKOYGqJHJkEe93ZfNy5uyOoxF+b24wcHGhLVFcxFupEw2kNA= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=eIAyqi lYHgkkzrjFvlhBcFnClmY+TLSDxGEw3X23aXc=; b=ntDo5Dpk9aI522pjDJggBq +hRSNpNRLF5gZCXg2xylmmzeCtsejJSjTy9zENv1yDWql7zxNzZnmbAojSDgu4yp 7hPkoDwlxEYdlFgewBWIdo9vgj3w0xSjZ0U8557K5xkbg+C15veJ8iN3fkwRM437 NBG4DBPxhTGWDYeAsCNLwGErA3wXA3m0w2kCyxq5/j2iqmJciEZzRo7GPWcoVM4M suUbdAP7BA13oShmNcL47o3eLLkoVC5niEVGkpS2NYKREI+K039c/20/dIwnj0oO Szub6I4uLtCDoANqJydX6za2X1oF72iIKan9JE99DOGmUBh7MlF6rIlXwI8/blZQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:MrmlYN_WhBkyrVKEiKsohm7LZAy7HdqmlN_SGHPglcaW58e7UA9AAA> <xme:MrmlYBvzJfbifdGzc_R4KGCHywl8HoQI6qok3S6cINMoJT3GsJU7pj5IOscyYmk6I 5mIXleqIRDB7g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdejtddggeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfpfgvihhlucflvghnkhhinhhsfdcuoehnvghilhhjsehf rghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheeuhfdujedtie evkedvhfffgfelfeelhfefkeehhfekleekhfefueefveffjeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhgvihhljhesfhgrshhtmhgrih hlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:MrmlYLAc12QSEM1QmPkXbzrAASQH3dESMnWwc0PHETooNyMXZRbJMw> <xmx:MrmlYBfDgIoTdz74g1kyUvOxeYnGCBhBTmve1ivobQpGaj0cKT4hkg> <xmx:MrmlYCN_ka-jPsmsiy7z8PcYVN6B_kYBe60vUdlVuLtXysfseSOp-Q> <xmx:M7mlYIaeH-cCQejkrkRkAewYtuHTk1fLyllOC3CSIyGAvoDriLA6Aw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A3C3218005D; Wed, 19 May 2021 21:19:46 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-701-g78bd539edf-fm-ubox-20210517.001-g78bd539e
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <7b1921b8-d9d6-4373-a3ce-7d50d9d49919@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <03d5828a-8fea-bbb6-f905-e091aca18279@fastmail.com>
References: <162135234857.29960.6719234050707785444@ietfa.amsl.com> <03d5828a-8fea-bbb6-f905-e091aca18279@fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:19:46 +1000
From: "Neil Jenkins" <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
To: calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=9d3a547d754d48b0b6a7eb4204ef919f
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/oszqOHoy2iY76Kq5_lI8IJ3PIBQ>
Subject: Re: [calsify] =?utf-8?q?SECOND_Last_Call=3A_=3Cdraft-ietf-calext-jsc?= =?utf-8?q?alendar-32=2Etxt=3E_=28JSCalendar=3A_A_JSON_representation_of_c?= =?utf-8?q?alendar_data=29_to_Proposed_Standard?=
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 01:19:53 -0000

On Wed, 19 May 2021, at 22:17, Ken Murchison wrote:
> A couple of nits however.

> Section 4.1.2:

> *For recurring events and
   tasks, the UID is associated with the master object and so is the
                                                           ^^
  same for all occurrences;*
> Should this be "therefore" instead of "so" ?


I would read that identically. What do you understand as the semantic difference between "so" and "therefore" here?
* *
> Section 4.4.6, "email":

> This is the email address *of the participant to contact the
      participant...*
> The above doesn't sound right to me.  Perhaps "This is the email address used to contact the participant..." is better?


Yeah, it's a little clumsy. I think we could replace "of the participant" with "to use".

Neil.