Re: [calsify] RFC7986 and EMAIL parameter

[Neil Jenkins <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the background Cyrus. So just to confirm, the CUA is:
 * The target for sending iTIP messages. This may be a mailto URI for iMIP, but may also be some other UI (which is essentially an opaque string to clients) if you have some internal mechanism for delivering the messages.
 * A kind of UID that's consistent for the same participant across different events.
Is that right? Presuming so, then going back to the discussion of translation between iCalendar and JSCalendar, I think this maps very cleanly with the current spec:
 * The CUA maps to the sendTo property <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-32#page-36> of the Participant. There would be a single value in the sendTo map: if it's a `mailto:` URI the value would be under the key `imip`, otherwise it would be under the key `other`.
 * The EMAIL parameter value maps to the email <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-32#page-36> property of the Participant. Just as Cyrus says it's supposed to work in iCalendar, this may be different to the iMIP address and is for sending normal email to the participant, not iMIP messages.
Neil.