IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8984 (6872)

Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 08 March 2022 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341C53A160D for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:20:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=StpvSknw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=nnsTKxrq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0q7Cmgt_GkEh for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2733C3A160E for <calsify@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:20:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA903201F1D; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:20:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:20:51 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=xwkRNVtaxhXzE5 Hk88XaYdDt3/CUBWIJjDEi4Mv5lWI=; b=StpvSknwpkQYF+FI2LAhczToEtN1Zz Ia/6Mxs4xIDERxtBFwDO8VUL04bK7lYonYwqq+7hHPPU7EDMBpa5rbqOyDVdQO7I V+JkPdNCG50DQ8CmYsbhsbDzuU+SkzwIHk747L2o0+y4k/jqLKztbGgBmRw3VLtb lS7E9hsrrZGt4HbdAgMaZ1tinhpnhHZeY3IVH9dF34GKIY3kOwgYcWLhqTi/BdPB 5MqXieI7RelQ8I9mnAPocx44ukIQ10YdF58cnBfuHOp/4C+8TO+6OIQUOXT459So wgwdt1sRQ1Tqi7TabRzHo9JR+bHlXDS0Z8UCtT2mQY2QDYYj0feKzDUQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xwkRNVtaxhXzE5Hk8 8XaYdDt3/CUBWIJjDEi4Mv5lWI=; b=nnsTKxrqD+pLgny7i//CA7W1rxltfysB3 kyP7gI4azoLafrTXRo6RIIWdxywU46M/Fb1XvzZeUkF27yun6YGkUIKWAnVoYyf6 CrO3TYC6P3mbpB5pkLniS2FTS355qF5Bfvxk4cBHap1erSFO4kBEruSRcD1VJs4V X2155yqeROwSjD1tjNjux15Pd+XrgQncSenI7+VhBus6B0yj7UWU2E0q0c6lAldx kycwQsrsgxuWhe2tYlYbHTUt1OxgaYpCJK09r4RUn53Cs7jXcf1qwJcLd7+emxIV Rm1SEzQNw44h1izAIPVyVDT693CG0GO4eBo3zdA0HP8MoaCN1bClg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:QWYnYkmHBsLsrJDLILgZUVcPz3iUpGwxIMy1y4tXPXCVU9iaGTrPYQ> <xme:QWYnYj1Mlcex9cuS-Hn1BJNgmtpKdpc_B_JL1Y2Ej-owSV9ziLieo_Zm6IQg_Xf0F RDFNP2UQc-FDg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudduiedgieduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdftohgs vghrthcuufhtvghprghnvghkfdcuoehrshhtohesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehgeeuvddtkefhtefgueefgfdvueetgeeffeelhedv udegjeejhfetuefgveevieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehrshhtohesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:QmYnYiqcrEI8hLi-P9EQ31camkRI8zJzbcan6s368MRHN2SIwvzMzg> <xmx:QmYnYgmmZx8-xtUcTsf7VYEddkliD-mNzFBLLTof1gfDOYBeHItu3w> <xmx:QmYnYi2M3ZiIemSoPw8oFNR3TelG2WVN9ywO1vp7sP9UIcpjrb83Bg> <xmx:QmYnYlRzHjPMg0mYTbLtrW6BqnuoQjW24Yma0N6AD50A6Inej1ji8Q>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E544CAC0E99; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:20:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-4869-g350fa62b48-fm-20220307.001-g350fa62b
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <e4562686-6654-4bb3-9f82-6ea36bf07565@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a6e33707-6f9f-4096-bf3f-a04aaf398e5b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
References: <20220307163210.73B6AE52D9@rfc-editor.org> <a6e33707-6f9f-4096-bf3f-a04aaf398e5b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:20:19 -0500
From: Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>
To: Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com>, rfc-editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Cc: calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1919a4a5930045469f1357356e5a1412"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/ry7RONmk3gItCbWjJoiYVi7lSUc>
Subject: Re: [calsify] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8984 (6872)
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:20:58 -0000

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022, at 11:18 PM, Neil Jenkins wrote:
> I think we need to explicitly state *excluded* as an allowed property too though to make it clear that this should still be included in recurrenceOverrides?

Right, need to add that! I can't figure out how to update an errata, so maybe I need to cancel this one and create a new errata?

Cheers,
Robert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email