IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] PROPOSAL: recharter CALEXT and bring contact work and maintenance in charter

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 23 November 2021 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2900C3A040E for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:53:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=NTDunYgt; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Vr3RNr6G
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xzk14XYtOp4F for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:53:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B35AE3A0403 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:53:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199373200A16 for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 23:53:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 23:53:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=9bDsVle Ps31DkEobeoIsPlSbYtugupgT6rEIY6tzF9Q=; b=NTDunYgtsLra1gIjY6u47Vq t1EWbcIpnqCD4kVZQJsuWaLRShf2ObK4RlzVj87ZPDLNZad1KcMXgiNlNSBLbUMZ /phd2fnaDScr7AimxLtuyqQoGY7fpG0z4JaZaX9TCu+qV0MlzChS08iRyKzmomsq qBV8P+V76MzqTh0uJCJeMgJZ9ovdKEbiuKEUXOghg5zXJxyYM3Fv2hklXdpn6/pR Himtkh8Mn0W1Wt0ETjeEj+JOmlgNVnxpnLOfYNo06oplXeusDD5JvV0U5X7nyeb2 Qud5ARJOC37AjdsqoaU1HeeLbrHZXOLf7kA2Ik5DPE/20ouTulSLsc68qV2UrAA= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9bDsVl ePs31DkEobeoIsPlSbYtugupgT6rEIY6tzF9Q=; b=Vr3RNr6Grjq3n8kvv8IB8d hNLP+K5Rnr2+b41EbYxbvDa+B+xleRpzMmuIsUa8KjXWCV8eSVuDWFQeA55lC+Ca uWj7mN1XTlwJPPJiB++LMOZCNAuRXx2dLMnCa143v7gouPjlj1cWQnqmaURH2EEe VHo9z3X2l5hCRoz44JZw09GYD2P+4+IgDu4HjMEkBIddCmMWn8FzcUAsAIAZ9Llz 3Kxq5ODk9X2zbKRgBdTmFXh0dAkPZ3QfolToxYTw0KR7cl9pnwCKBxGb9cgupqd2 /RP5lUB3Vb9AnNPhqsF3J3PH3zCjunAQ3cbjKqMJxHXuDf2KyjcbNuvoDfjx/H6Q ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:sXOcYVraU7HzmMEjrW854goJ3pN3rVzuoPlxTw-O4ChT3Du0IPGDSg> <xme:sXOcYXrwznU549Ug5nv3KwRHKQvEE2sQ5Eal6QHINJx_6uWu1F5zPbNmg3KBLMBv0 rqD-v3Z9GI>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrgeehgdejtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtre erreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhhonhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehf rghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehteegfeevte duffevteehfffghefhvdevkeeuhfehueetudehgfegieekjeetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrih hlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:sXOcYSNYAomEDGu6Moes7xOuLXW0L6JRdRCTfqJ9BKt0UXhfIwBAxw> <xmx:sXOcYQ5lVlDW4CkG-Euyrip8hH0eilFFEKQmBdKhurO-K5zRHrfm1Q> <xmx:sXOcYU5fv1w0OBEn_2OB2FAqZSxpFF_IYlOn00Gs5vytJmugddefLw> <xmx:sXOcYWF2v_GexVmSXC1njHUulRh1gDK4mQZRYhe9yNyvsnE4BLAb-w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 88392AC03DB; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 23:53:05 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-4393-g01c3059bda-fm-20211122.002-g01c3059b
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <9e5e1728-a79e-4801-ac82-dab60703d90b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <24EBDAF4-DD1B-45A9-8220-53DB039ED535@ribose.com>
References: <283e06dd-9bbe-41af-b9bf-9326ed91c131@dogfood.fastmail.com> <72827edc-3640-b046-1cde-5efa8244729b@gmail.com> <24EBDAF4-DD1B-45A9-8220-53DB039ED535@ribose.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:52:45 +1100
From: "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=178cb84fa45149f5960b08354631b81b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/vPmYCTt2inzIklrWdE2AaiA0nCw>
Subject: Re: [calsify] PROPOSAL: recharter CALEXT and bring contact work and maintenance in charter
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 04:53:14 -0000


On Thu, Nov 18, 2021, at 19:53, Ronald Tse wrote:
> I agree with the proposal as well. This gives a natural home to drafts like vobject which binds the calendars and contacts to a single data model, also led by CalConnect. 
> 
> Preferably the constraints under "The working group will work under the following parameters” can be relaxed as they seem rather restrictive. They are good guidance notes but I don’t see why those constraints are normatively "necessary”.

I would be happy to trim it back.  The IETF doesn't like charters which grant too much leeway to willy-nilly avoid backwards compatibility.  Not that we would, since all the people currently writing drafts run products that need to interoperate with the existing world - but it helps turn away proposed new work that wants to break everything if you can point to the charter and say "we promised not to do that".

> Under "The working group will maintain relationships with other working groups” I would propose adding “CalConnect” as a place to collaborate with, too.

Yep - for sure.  I thought about that - just wanted to avoid the complexity of setting up a formal liaison, so I'm not sure how the IESG will feel about listing a collaborator for which there's no formal arrangement.  Happy to put CalConnect in there and run it up the flagpole and see.

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email